shahrezad's profileShahrezad's hjerterumPhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog


    Solidaritet demonstration 9 aug kl 16 foran IRI's amassade

     

    Til:

    Fagforeninger, partier, politiske og menneskerettigheders organisationer

                       

                                                

    I forbindelse med kidnapning og fængsling af formanden for ”Teherans bus-arbejders forbund”, Mansour Osanlou, samt fortsat fængsling af stiftende medlem af ”Koordinationskomiteen for dannelse af arbejderorganisationer i Iran” Mahmoud Salehi, har de internationale faglige organisationer ITUC (www.ituc-csi.org) og ITF( www.ift.org.uk) erklæret dagen d. 9. august for aktionsdagen for solidaritet med de to kollegaer.

    I samme forbindelse vil der her i Danmark blive holdt en demonstration foran den iranske ambassade torsdag den 9. august 2007, kl. 16:00.

    I det følgende er der vedlagt en forkortet oversættelse af fællesbrevet fra ITUC og ITF. Brevet kan i original version ses ved at klikke på følgende link:

    http://www.itfglobal.org/solidarity/osanloo2.cfm

    Alle faglige, politiske, og menneskerettigheders organisationer, der gerne vil støtte eller anbefale demonstrationen, bedes kontakte os på: farrokh.jafari@mail.dk

    På forhånd tak

    Styrk den internationale solidaritet


    Underskriver organisationer:


    1. Komiteen til forsvar for politiske fanger i Iran – Danmark

    2. Den internationale solidaritetskomite med arbejderbevægelsen i Iran – Danmark

    3. Nej til krigs-kampagnen ”Frihed til Irans folk”

    4. Bogklubben Pooyandeh – København


    Forkortet oversættelse af fællesbrevet fra ITUC og ITF



    24. juli 2007

     

    Kære venner

    Vi skriver til jer for at bede om, at jeres organisation deltager i den internationale aktionsdag d. 9. august i forbindelse med, at Mansour Osanlou og Mahmoud Salehi, 2 prominente fagligt aktive, sidder nu i fængsel i Iran.


    Vi ved, at sommerperioden, især her nord for ækvator, ikke er nogen god tid for at starte en international solidaritetsaktion. Men vi mener alligevel, at de særlige omstændigheder i disse to sager kræver en hurtig og beslutsom aktion, hvis vores to fængslede kollegaer skal frigives indenfor en overskuelig fremtid.


    M. Osanlou, formand for Teherans bus-arbejderes forbund (Vahed Syndicate)


    Mange af jer må have set eller hørt om Osanlous meget vigtige besøg i ITF’s og ITUC’s møder i London og Bryssel i juni i år. Især har ITUC´s generalforsamling, efter at have givet Osanlou et stående bifald, besluttet at tilbyde Mansour Osanlou fuld solidaritet, hvis han fik problemer efter sin hjemkost til Iran. Ulykkeligvis er dette, lige præcist hvad der er sket. Det er nu 2 uger siden, at Osanlou blev kidnappet den 10. juli, mens han kørt i en bus. Han er nu tilbage i det notoriske Evin fængsel tiltalt for ”konspiration mod national sikkerhed”.


    ITF har iværksat en succesfuld underskriftindsamling. Klik venligst på linket nedenunder for underskrivelse:

    http://www.itfglobal.org/solidarity/osanloo2.cfm



    M. Salehi, Koordinationskomiteen for dannelse af arbejderorganisationer

    Mahmoud Salehis helbredstilstands forværres dagligt. Som I sandsynligvis ved, er han stiftende medlem af ”Saqez bageriarbejdernes sammenslutning” og medlem af den overfor nævnte koordinationskomite. Hans faglige aktiviteter har afstedkommet konstant forfølgelse fra myndighedernes side og på trods af hans dårlige helbredstilstand er han lige nu i fængsel i Sanandaj i Kurdistan provinsen, langt væk fra sin familie.


    Ønskede aktioner den 9. august


    Vi håber, at både Osanlou og Salehi vil blive frigivet inden d. 9. august og vi bliver ved med at lægge pres på de iranske myndigheder for at opnå frigivelsen af dem. Men hvis en af dem eller begge stadigvæk er i fængsel den 9. august vil vi indkalde alle medlemsorganisationer i ITUC og ITF samt Globale Union Federations til at støtte op om vores internationale aktionsdag for solidaritet med iranske arbejdere den dag.

    9. august markerer præcist årsdagen for Osanlous sidste frigivelse fra fængslet. Frigivelsen den gang var helt uden tvivl resultatet af vedvarende protester og pres fra den internationale arbejderbevægelsens organisationer. Husk den succesfulde aktionsdag 15. februar 2006 i protest mod massearrestationer, som de iranske myndigheder havde iværksat måneden før, da ”Teherans bus-arbejderes forbund” havde igangsat en endagsstrejke med krav om Osanlous frigivelse.


    På denne årsdag beder vi medlemsorganisationerne om at besøge iranske ambassader og konsulater i jeres lande med protestbreve eller kopier af ITF´s underskriftsindsamling. Der kan også holdes pressekonferencer eller arbejdspladsmøder eller enhver anden aktion, som I vil finde relevant for denne aktionsdag.


    I bedes hurtigst muligt at informere os om jeres organisations planer med hensyn til aktionsdagen 9. august. Skriv venligst til urata_mac@itf.org.uk og turights@ituc-csi.org.

    På forhånd tak og med faglige hilsner



    Guy Ryder, generalsekretær for ITUC og David Cockroft, generalsekretær for ITF



    Art for Peace

     
     
     
     Art For Peace and Iran-West Amity: "Isfahan Matisse" Painting

    By Gideon Polya, MWC News, Australia

    IRAN is a remarkable country in that, part from inevitable border conflicts, it has not seriously invaded any other country for the best part of 2  millennia. Conversely, over the last 14 centuries it has been invaded by Arabs (641 AD), Mongols (1258), Portuguese in coastal areas (16th – 17th centuries), Russians (from 1722 onwards), Afghans (18th century), Russia (19th century), and Russia and Britain (20th centuries). The US got into the act with the 1953 US-backed overthrow of democratic rule (after Prime Minister Mossadegh's attempted nationalization of Anglo-Iranian oil), the installation of the Shah's dictatorship, the US-backed Iraqi  invasion in 1980 and the subsequent 1980-1988 Iran–Iraq war that killed millions of Iranians (1.5 million war dead; 1980-1988 excess deaths in the country as a whole total 2.1 million).

     


    "Isfahan Matisse" by Gideon Polya (click here to see full size)

     

    Now Iran faces the horrendous prospect of a possibly TERMINAL nuclear cataclysm as the US backs Baluchi terrorists in South Eastern Iran, advances its nuclear-armed aircraft carriers into positions off the Iranian coast and the Americans and Israelis advance their virulent, war-mongering anti-Iranian rhetoric. Thus simple Google Searches for the utterly obscene phrases "nuke Iran" and "attack Iran" today yield 132,000 and 695,000 URLs, respectively.  Reports from authoritative media such as the BBC, The New Statesman and Global Research indicate that the Americans and Israelis may be ready to unleash NUCLEAR war on this peaceful, remote, non-aggressive country of 71 million people.

    The human consequences of an invasion and occupation of Iran (population 71 million) can be roughly estimated by PROPORTIONALITY from what the Racist Bushites (RBs) and Racist Zionists (RBs) have done to Palestine (population 3.8 million), Iraq (population 27 million) and Afghanistan (population 26 million).  The post invasion excess deaths (avoidable deaths, deaths that did not have to happen) in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories now (May 2007) total 0.3 million, 1.0 million and 2.4 million (mostly Women and Children and due to gross Occupier violation of the Geneva Convention that demands that occupiers keep their conquered subjects alive); post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.2 million, 0.5 million and 1.9 million, respectively (90% of these deaths being avoidable); and there is a  refugee nightmare of  4.3 million Palestinians registered with the UN, 4 million Iraqi refugees (half of whom have fled their country) and 3.7 million Afghan refugees (see MWC News and here ).

    However the human consequences for Iran – and indeed its neighbours – from a NUCLEAR attack by Israel or America will be utterly disastrous and genocidal.

    Faced with this appalling scenario that appears to be coalescing into nightmare reality, what can a decent person do? My concern is heightened by my and my family's friendship with lovely Iranians. Words having failed, my most recent response to this horrendously violent world is Painting for Peace -  Art for Peace to demonstrate with beautiful images the Unity of Mankind. I have painted a huge painting called "Isfahan Matisse"  that conflates the stunningly beautiful, pure Islamic tile pattern-based Art of Iran (as most wonderfully shown in the holy city of Isfahan) with modern, avant garde Western painting as exemplified by French painter Henri Matisse.

    Several weeks ago, MWC News published the image of a huge painting I had created called "Alhambra Pollock" that conflates pure, Medieval  Islamic Art from the 13th and 14th centuries in the Alhambra Palace of Moorish Spain with Golden Rectangle (Fibonacci Sequence, Da Vinci Code) geometries from religious paintings of the Italian Renaissance and 20,000 year old Australian Aboriginal rock painting figures - to create a beautiful image conflating pure Islamic Art with post-war American Jackson Pollock Abstract Expressionism .

    The beautiful IDEA was that if you could combine the extremes of pure religious Islamic Art with radical, avant garde American Abstract Expressionism then you can have a beautiful IMAGE  that describes the essential Unity of Man – and therefore argues cogently that there is no call for the hatred, the xenophobia, the anti-Arab anti-Semitism, the Islamophobia, warmongering , wars, invasions, occupations and horrendous human suffering currently being inflicted by US-Israeli State Terrorism (USIST) and the US Alliance (USA) on a swathe of countries from Somalia to Afghanistan – almost from the Nile to the Indus. In its awful actuality, the Bush War on Terror is a cowardly and racist War on Women and Children, a War on Arab Women and Children, a War on Muslim Women and Children, a War on Asian Women and Children and a War on non-European Women and Children.

    My "Isfahan Matisse" (1.3 metres x 2.9 metres; acrylic on doubly-primed canvas) has essentially the same geometrical, cultural and humanitarian basis as "Alhambra Pollock", described by the acronym PEACE that stands for  Pólya, Escher, Alhambra Cultural Ecumenism (after my Great Uncle George Pólya who published a mathematical analysis of the 17 plane symmetry groups or "tile patterns" exploited in Islamic Art, and  Dutch lithographer M.C. Escher who was inspired both by George Pólya's analysis and by the wonderful tile pattern Art of the Alhambra Palace in Granada, Spain). "Isfahan  Matisse" has figurative elements and brilliant colours redolent of the wonderful work of contemporary French painter Henri Matisse. The figurative elements give the sense of the wonderful Calligraphy often superimposed on Islamic tile Art.

    Whereas "Alhambra Pollock" was based on Four Seasons and ONE YEAR in the life a human being, "Isfahan Matisse" is based on ONE DAY in the life of a person. I have interpreted Tchaikovsky's wonderful last Symphony Number 6 – The Pathétique – as one day in the life of a Man. This wonderful symphony was popularly named The Pathétique because of Tchaikovsky's untimely death shortly after it was performed for the first time and its extraordinary conclusion. However Tchaikovsky himself was extremely pleased with the symphony. One Christmas morning, watching the dawn break over the beautiful Yarra River valley in Victoria, Australia – and coincidentally listening to The Pathétique Symphony - it suddenly dawned on me that this work was not a statement of the tragedy of human existence (as commonly thought by pessimistic interpretations) but an Ode to Joy, the accurate description of one joyous day in the life of a human being. No wonder Tchaikovsky was so pleased with this great work – as I am with my humble effort to conflate the beauties of Isfahan and Matisse (pinnacles of Iranian and French culture, respectively) in the description of one joyous day in the life of a human being.

    Peace is the only way and this present contribution of PEACE – Pólya, Escher, Alhambra Cultural Ecumenism -  through ART is one of many possible ways to increase empathy for the Other that underscores amity and understanding between human beings. I have previously painted a series of huge paintings as part of this commitment to Art for Peace, and for respect for Woman and for Mother and Child.  You can see all of these paintings on MWC News, namely  Sydney Madonna,  Manhattan Madonna , Melbourne MadonnaQana , Truelove . and Alhambra Pollock .

    With the election of conservative, pro-American Nicolas Sarkozy in France there is an even greater need for Islam-West Amity as the world teeters on the brink of a nuclear nightmare in the Middle East. Please tell all your friends and associates about "Isfahan Matisse" and spread the positive message of Islam-West Amity, Franco-Iranian Amity  and Iran-West Amity through this joyous painting.


    Dr Gideon Polya

    ,  MWC News Chief political editor, published some 130 works in a 4 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text "Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds" (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London, 2003), and is currently writing a book on global mortality ---
    Other articles by this author :

    http://mwcnews.net/content/view/1375/247/

     

    http://www.payvand.com/news/07/may/1180.html

    Miles for peace

     

            Miles For Peace: Iranians embark on peace cycling tour

    Source: Miles For Peace

    We are pleased to inform you that, considering the current state of world affairs and our particularly sensitive situation in Iran, "Mercy for All" charity organization (www.mercyforall.org) has - in partnership with other NGOs - planned a cycling tour around Europe and North America to convey Iranian people's message of peace, friendship and solidarity to the rest of the world.


    During this journey, which will begin on May 10th 2007, fourteen Iranian cyclists will travel city by city across 4 European countries (Italy, France, Germany, U.K) and the United States to communicate the pacifist message of Iranian people, as found in our manifesto, to other nations around the world.

    The cyclists will also offer a hand-made emblem of "Miles for Peace", as a symbol of friendship on behalf Iranian people, to the mayors of the host cities as elected representatives of European and American people.


    The cyclists in Paris



    We Iranians are peace-loving people;;
    we aspire for a genuine and sustainable peace, for our own nation as well as all other members of the great family of humankind. We view such peace as the divine essence of humanity.

    The peaceful and humanitarian nature of the Iranian people is well reflected by a poem of our great 13th century national poet; Saadi, which is carved on the main entrance of the United Nation Organization:

     

    Of one essence is the human race
    Thusly has creation put the base

    One limb impacted is sufficient
    For all others to feel the mace

    We Iranians, love all other nations.

    It was one of our ancient kings Cyrus (who lived more than 2500 years ago) who set the example, motto and criterion as to how to treat strangers in war and in peace.

    We Iranians wish to be a constructive member of the international community. we believe that :

    • Humanity is an indivisible entity
    • The world is home to all humans
    • No man and no nation are needless of other men and other nations
    • No nation is superior or inferior to any other nation.

    We Iranians desire to contribute to the enrichment of culture and science and to the sustainability of peace for our nation as well as all others.

    We believe that every success in every field by any individual in any part of the world belongs to the human community as a whole. In the same way, we believe that any form of aggression and moral transgression anywhere in the world, brings shame and disgrace to all humans and has a devastating impact on the entire body of human society. That is why each one of us has to take responsibility vis-à-vis all world events. We hope that governments across the world respect and uphold this universal longing of man for peace

    Tentative U.S. visit schedule:

    Sat, June 16th
    Sun, June 17th
    Mon, June 18th
    Tue, June 19th
    Wed, June 20th
    Thu, June 21st
    Fri, June 22nd
    NEW YORK
    NEW YORK
    NEW YORK 
    NEW YORK -  leaving towards BLOMINGTON  
    Arriving in BLOMINGTON , meetings with peace groups

    Traveling towards ST.LOUIS
    Meetings at  ST.LOUIS (MO)
    Sat, June 23rd
    Sun, June 24th
    Mon, June 25th
    Tue, June 26th
    Wed, June 27th
    Thu, June 28th
    Fri, June 29th
    Traveling towards Chicago
    Chicago - International Peace Day
    Traveling towards NORTH CALIFORNIA

    On the way to NORTH CALIFORNIA


    On the way to NORTH CALIFORNIA

    SAN FRANCISCO
    SAN FRANCISCO
    Sat, June 30th
    Sun, July 1st
    Mon, July 2nd
    Tue, July 3rd
    Wed, July 4th
    Thu, July 5th
    Fri, July 6th
    SAN FRANCISCO
    SAN FRANCISCO
    SAN JOSE

    SAN FRANCISCO

    Biking towards L.A
    Biking towards L.A
    Arriving in L.A

    Sat, July 7th
    Sun, July 8th
    Mon, July 9th
    Tue, July 10th
    Wed, July 11th
    L.A
    L.A - traveling towards BALTIMORE
    BALTIMOR

    Biking towards W.D.C
    W.D.C

    http://www.milesforpeace.org/

    Amnesty Rapport af Iran2007

     

             

                     The human rights situation in IRAN

    Se Også :

    http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE130592007

    http://web.amnesty.org/pages/irn-220607-editorial-eng

    og mine egne blog her om

    Islamic Republic of Iran

    Head of state: Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Ayatollah Sayed 'Ali Khamenei
    Head of government: President: Dr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
    Death penalty: retentionist
    International Criminal Court: signed

    The human rights situation deteriorated, with civil society facing increasing restrictions on fundamental freedoms of expression and association. Scores of political prisoners, including prisoners of conscience, continued to serve prison sentences imposed following unfair trials in previous years. Thousands more arrests were made in 2006, mostly during or following demonstrations. Human rights defenders, including journalists, students and lawyers, were among those detained arbitrarily without access to family or legal representation. Torture, especially during periods of pre-trial detention, remained commonplace. At least 177 people were executed, at least four of whom were under 18 at the time of the alleged offence, including one who was under 18 at the time of execution. Two people were reportedly stoned to death. Sentences of flogging, amputation and eye-gouging continued to be passed. The true numbers of those executed or subjected to corporal punishment were probably considerably higher than those reported.

    Background

    The rift between Iran and the international community over the government's insistence on maintaining its nuclear enrichment programme continued to widen. In March, the International Atomic Energy Agency referred Iran to the UN Security Council. In December the Security Council agreed on a programme of sanctions against Iran following Iran's failure to meet an August deadline to suspend the programme. Iran continued to accuse foreign governments of fomenting unrest in border areas, and in turn was accused of involvement in the worsening security situation in Iraq. In February the US government sought an extra

    US$75 million to "support democracy" in Iran. President Ahmadinejad continued to make statements threatening to the State of Israel and questioning the Holocaust. The European Union-Iran human rights dialogue remained suspended.

    Local elections and elections to the Assembly of Experts, which oversees the appointment of the Supreme Leader, were held in December. The Council of Guardians, which reviews laws and policies to ensure that they uphold Islamic tenets and the Constitution, excluded all but 164 Assembly of Experts candidates, including at least 12 women who registered, on the basis of discriminatory selection procedures. The results of both elections were generally seen as a setback to the government of President Ahmadinejad.

    The authorities faced armed opposition from Kurdish and Baluchi groups.

    In December, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution condemning the human rights situation in Iran. Iran failed to set a date for visits by any UN Human Rights mechanisms despite having issued a standing invitation in 2002.

    Repression of minorities

    Ethnic and religious minorities remained subject to discriminatory laws and practices which continued to be a source of social and political unrest.

    Arabs

    Arabs continued to complain of discrimination, including in access to resources, as well as forced evictions. In October, the Council of Guardians approved a bill allocating 2 per cent of Iran's oil revenues to Khuzestan province, home to many of Iran's Arabs.

    Scores of Arabs were detained during the year. At least 36 were sentenced to death or received lengthy prison terms after conviction in unfair trials of involvement in causing bomb explosions in Ahvaz and Tehran in 2005. Five were executed including Mehdi Nawaseri and Mohammad Ali Sawari who were executed in public in February following the broadcast of their televised "confessions".

    • At least five women were detained, some along with their children, between February and April, in circumstances which suggested that they may have been held in order to force their husbands to give themselves up or make confessions. Four women and two children were believed to be still held at the end of the year.

    • Seven lawyers defending some of those accused in connection with the bombings were summoned to appear before the Ahvaz Revolutionary Prosecutor in October on charges of "acting against state security". The summons was issued in connection with a letter they had sent to the Head of the Revolutionary Court in Ahvaz complaining about deficiencies in the trial of their clients.

    Azerbaijanis

    In May, widespread demonstrations took place in mainly Azerbaijani north-western towns and cities in protest at the publication of a cartoon offensive to Azerbaijanis in the state-run Iran newspaper. Hundreds, if not thousands, were arrested and scores reportedly killed by the security forces, although official sources downplayed the scale of arrests and killings. Further arrests occurred, many around events and dates significant to the Azerbaijani community such as the Babek Castle gathering in Kalayber in June, and a boycott of the start of the new academic year over linguistic rights for the Azerbaijani community.

    • Prisoner of conscience Abbas Lisani was detained in June for over three months for his participation in the demonstrations in Ardabil against the cartoon. In September, he was sentenced to 16 months' imprisonment and 50 lashes on charges including "disturbing state security". At the end of October, five days after submitting an appeal, he was redetained, and his family was later informed that his sentence had been increased to 18 months' imprisonment with an additional three years of enforced internal exile. He stated his unconditional opposition to the use of violence. By the end of the year he faced two further prison sentences imposed for his attendance at the 2003 and 2005 Babek Castle gatherings.

    Kurds

    In February, clashes between Kurdish demonstrators and the security forces in Maku and other towns reportedly led to at least nine deaths and scores, if not hundreds, of arrests. In March, Kurdish Majles deputies wrote to the President demanding an investigation into the killings and calling for those responsible to be brought to justice. An investigation was reportedly set up, but its findings were not known by the end of the year. Some of those detained later reportedly received prison terms of between three and eight months.

    • Mohammad Sadeq Kabudvand, the Head of the Human Rights Organization of Kurdistan and editor of the banned weekly newspaper Payam-e Mardom, had his 18-month suspended prison sentence for "publishing lies and articles aimed at creating racial and tribal tension and discord" increased on appeal to one year's actual imprisonment. Although summoned to prison in September, he remained at liberty at the end of the year, pending an appeal to the Supreme Court. Other Payam-e Mardom journalists were also brought to trial.

    Baluchis

    In March a Baluchi armed group, Jondallah, killed 22 Iranian officials and took at least seven hostage, in Sistan-Baluchistan province. Following the incident, scores, possibly hundreds, of people were arrested; many were reportedly taken to unknown locations. In the months following the attacks, the number of executions announced in Baluchi areas increased dramatically. Dozens were reported to have been executed by the end of the year.

    Religious minorities

    Members of Iran's religious minorities were detained or harassed on account of their faith.

    In February over 1,000 Nematollahi Sufis peacefully protesting against an order to evacuate their place of worship in Qom were arrested. Hundreds were injured by members of the security forces and members of organized pro-government groups. In May, 52 Sufis, including two lawyers representing the group, were sentenced to one year's imprisonment, flogging and a fine, and the lawyers were banned from practising law. In August, Grand Ayatollah Fazel Lankarani issued a religious edict designating Sufism as "null and void".

    Several evangelical Christians, mostly converts from Islam, were detained, apparently in connection with their religious activities.

    • In September, Fereshteh Dibaj and her husband, Reza Montazemi, were detained for nine days before being released on bail. Fereshteh Dibaj is the youngest daughter of convert Mehdi Dibaj who was murdered in 1994 shortly after being released from prison where he had been held for nine years for "apostasy".

    Sixty-five Baha'is were detained during 2006 and five remained held at the end of the year. In March Mehran Kawsari was released early from his three-year prison sentence imposed in connection with an open letter sent to the then President in November 2004.

    In March, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief expressed concern about an October 2005 letter instructing various government agencies to identify, and collect information about, Baha'is in Iran.

    Human rights defenders

    Human rights defenders faced deepening restrictions on their work and remained at risk of reprisals. In January, the Ministry of the Interior was reported to be preparing measures to restrict the activities of non-governmental organizations that allegedly received finance from "problematic internal and external sources aimed at overthrowing the system". Students, who remained a politically active section of society, were frequently targeted for reprisals, including arbitrary arrest and denial of the right to study in the new academic year.

    • In August, the Ministry of the Interior banned activities by the Centre for Defenders of Human Rights (CDHR), run by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Shirin Ebadi and other leading lawyers, stating that it did not have a permit. In September, the Ministry of the Interior said a permit would be issued "if changes were made to the [centre's] mission statement".

    • Abdolfattah Soltani, a lawyer and co-founder of the CDHR, was released on bail in March. He was later sentenced to five years' imprisonment for "disclosing confidential documents" and "propaganda against the system". The sentence was under appeal at the end of the year.

    • Prisoner of conscience Akbar Ganji, a journalist who implicated government officials in the murder of intellectuals and journalists in the 1990s, was released in March after completing his six-year prison sentence.

    Torture and cruel, inhuman and

    degrading punishments

    Torture remained common in many prisons and detention centres, particularly in the investigative stage of pre-trial detention when detainees are denied access to a lawyer for indefinite periods. At least seven people reportedly died in custody, some in circumstances where torture, ill-treatment or denial of medical care may have been contributory factors.

    • Political prisoners Akbar Mohammadi and Valiollah Feyz Mahdavi died in July and September respectively after going on hunger strike to protest at their continued detention.

    • Fourteen-year-old Mohammad Reza Evezpoor, an Iranian Azerbaijani, was arrested in April after writing "I am a Turk" on a wall. He was reportedly tortured during his three days in detention, including by being suspended by his feet for 24 hours and denied food and water. He was beaten again when rearrested in September.

    At least two amputations were carried out and one person was sentenced to eye-gouging. Flogging remained a common punishment.

    • Leyla Mafi received a flogging of 99 lashes in February before being released from prison into a women's rehabilitation centre. Forced into prostitution as an eight-year-old and raped repeatedly, she was arrested in early 2004 and charged with "acts contrary to chastity" for which she was sentenced to flogging followed by death. Following international pressure, her death sentence was overturned.

    Impunity

    Victims of human rights violations and their families continued to lack redress.

    • A re-examination, ordered in 2001, of the cases of Ministry of Intelligence officials accused of the 1998 "serial murders", remained incomplete. Nasser Zarafshan, lawyer for the families of some of the victims, continued to serve a five-year prison sentence following his conviction on politically motivated charges.

    Death penalty

    At least 177 people were executed in 2006, including one minor and at least three others who were under 18 at the time of the alleged offence. Death sentences were imposed for a variety of crimes including drug smuggling, armed robbery, murder, political violence and sexual offences. Following domestic and international protests, the death sentences of some women and of some prisoners aged under 18 at the time of the alleged offence were suspended or lifted; some were sentenced to death again after a retrial. Two people were reportedly stoned to death despite a moratorium on stoning announced by the judiciary in 2002. Others remained under sentence of stoning to death. In September, Iranian human rights defenders launched a campaign to save nine women and two men sentenced to death by stoning and to abolish stoning in law. By the end of the year the stoning sentences of at least three of the 11 had been quashed.

    Freedom of expression and association

    Freedom of expression and association was increasingly curtailed. Internet access was increasingly restricted and monitored. Journalists and webloggers were detained and sentenced to prison or flogging and at least 11 newspapers were closed down. Relatives of detainees or of those sought by the authorities remained at risk of harassment or intimidation. Independent trade unionists faced reprisals and some academics, such as Ramin Jahanbegloo, were detained or dismissed from their posts.

    • Up to 1,000 members of the independent, but banned, Sherkat-e Vahed Bus Company Union were arrested in January after striking to demand recognition of their union and to protest at the detention of the union's head Mansour Ossanlu. All were later released, but dozens were still forbidden from returning to their jobs at the end of the year. Mansour Ossanlu was released on bail in August after being held for over seven months in connection with his trade union activities, but was redetained for one month in November, reportedly after attending meetings organized by the International Labour Organization.

    Women's rights

    Demonstrations in Tehran in March and June demanding an end to discrimination in law against women were broken up harshly by the security forces. Some protesters were injured.

    • Former Majles deputy Sayed Ali Akbar Mousavi-Kho'ini was arrested at the June demonstration and held for over four months before his release on bail in October. He reported that he had been tortured in detention.

    In August, women's rights activists launched a campaign to gather a million signatures to a petition demanding equal rights for women.

    AI country reports/visits

    Reports

    • Iran: Human rights defender at risk ? appeal case: Abdolfattah Soltani (AI Index: MDE 13/009/2006)

    • Iran: New government fails to address dire human rights situation (AI Index: MDE 13/010/2006)

    • Iran: Defending minority rights ? the Ahwazi Arabs (AI Index: MDE 13/056/2006

    http://report2007.amnesty.org/eng/Regions/Middle-East-and-North-Africa/Iran

    Death Sentences on child in Iran

       

                                

    Iran continues to pass death sentences on child offenders

    http://web.amnesty.org/pages/irn-220607-editorial-eng

     

    Real Player version

    Amnesty International (AI) is calling on the Iranian authorities to take immediate steps to end the shameful practice of executing child offenders (those convicted of crimes committed before the age of 18).

    According to the report Iran: The last executioner of children, Iran has executed more child offenders than any other country in the world since 1990.

    As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Iran has committed not to execute anyone for an offence committed when they were under the age of 18.

    Officials from the Iranian Government and the judiciary have repeatedly stated that Iran does not execute children. However, the facts tell a different story.

    The report states that 24 child offenders have been executed in Iran since 1990, 11 of whom were under 18 at the time of their execution. In most cases, the authorities waited until child offenders turned 18 before executing them. It is not clear whether the authorities understand that such executions still violate Iran's international obligation not to execute child offenders under the ICCPR.

    Real Lives -- Child Offenders

    Sina Paymard, the 16-year-old reprieved at the gallows in 2006 by relatives of the murder victim after he had played the flute.

    Delara Darabi, aged 20, faces execution after being convicted of the murder of her father's 58-year-old female cousin. She was 17 at the time of the crime.

    AI is aware of 71 child offenders who are currently under sentence of death in Iran. However, the lack of information available on the death penalty in the country means this number may only be a fraction of the total.

    Campaigning against the death penalty both inside and outside Iran can make -- and has made -- a difference. In some cases, death sentences have been overturned and the person has been released. In many more, stays of execution have been won.

    Campaigns have also prompted the Iranian authorities to publicly comment on cases, initiate reviews of cases, order retrials and even grant pardons or amnesties.

    Human rights defenders in Iran stress that international publicity and pressure in support of local efforts can help bring about change in the country. AI believes that campaigning can save lives and will eventually persuade the Iranian authorities to end the illegal execution of child offenders and bring their legal practices into line with their obligations under international law.

    AI opposes the death penalty for anyone, regardless of their age and the nature of the crime or the character of the condemned. Every execution is an affront to human rights and an act of premeditated cruelty that denies the right to life as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    AI's report calls for the abolition of the death penalty for child offenders in Iran. The Head of the Judiciary should immediately implement a moratorium on the execution of child offenders until such changes can be made law.

    The death sentences of the 71 child offenders documented in AI’s report, and any other child offenders on death row in Iran, must be commuted.

    Ending executions of child offenders in Iran, while a major objective in itself, is just one step on the road to total abolition -- but a vitally important step that should be taken without delay.

    For more information, see:
    Iran: End child executions (Press Release, 27 June 2007) (in Persian)

    Iran: The last executioner of children (Report, 27 June 2007)
    Read the report in Persian (PDF, 51 pages, 495kb)

    Modstand mod indblanding, og krig mod Iran

     

    Iranian NGOs express opposition to sanctions, military intervention and foreign interference in Iran

    (source: CASMII )
    Friday, June 29, 2007

     

    CASMII Press Release

    28 June 2007

    Leading Iranian NGOs express opposition to sanctions, military intervention and foreign interference in Iran.

    On the 20th anniversary of the chemical bombing of the Kurdish city of Sardasht in western Iran, a crime committed by the puppet Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussain and with full provision, support and acquiescence of Western governments, the Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran (CASMII), commemorates the forgotten victims of this crime who are still suffering the consequences of the effects of mustard gas, by launching a joint statement with Iranian NGOs: "The Society for Chemical Weapons Victims Support" (SCWVS) and "The Organisation for Defence of Victims of Violence" (ODVV), to express their opposition to sanctions, military intervention and foreign interference in Iran.

    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  [19]  
    نمونه اي از بمب شيميايي
    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  [19]  

    The joint petition highlights the catastrophic consequences of the Iraqi imposed war on Iran in the 1980s, the tragic impact of over a decade long Security Council sanctions on the Iraqi population, as a prelude to the invasion of 2003, and finally the US/UK illegal invasion and ongoing brutal occupation of Iraq.

    Based on the experiences of all the above, the joint petition voices urgent concern about the "dire and irreparable human consequences" on Iranian people of military intervention and sanctions.  It states that "Sanctions or military intervention in Iran will serve to strike a massive blow to the nascent civil society in Iran" and "will put to waste all attempts at building an indigenous internal democracy and the promotion of human rights. This will reverse for years, or even decades, the domestic process of reforms".

    The joint petition demands an end to foreign intervention, sanctions and threats of military intervention against Iran and urges the United States and its allies to end their policy of threats and confrontation with Iran and instead enter "direct dialogue without precondition". It further calls on the Islamic Republic of Iran to create the grounds for a stronger and greater unity of the people of Iran in the face of foreign pressures and threats by paying more attention to the observation of human rights.

    The Society for chemical Weapons victims Support (SCWVS) provides medical, social, legal and cultural support to more than 50,000 Iranian survivors of chemical weapons, who are still suffering from the long term effects of exposure.  SCWVS aims to improve the victims' quality of life as well as that of their family members. 

    The Organization for Defending Victims of Violence (ODDV) works in the area of human rights and humanitarian activities.  As well as educational courses and seminars to promote a culture of non-violence, it has established the Rehabilitation Institute for Victims of Social Violence and the Disabled which provides psychological, legal, physical rehabilitation and financial support for victims of violence. 

    In circumstances where Iran's survival and sovereignty is at stake, CASMII calls upon other Iranian NGOs to lend their voice to this cry of opposition to sanctions and military intervention against Iran by signing this or similar petitions.

    To view the petition please visit http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/2513 or contact CASMII for more details.

    [END] 

    This press release is also available in Persian [PDF]

     

    Mehrnoush Solouki bliver holdt tilbage i Iran

     
     
    Iran - Filmmaker with French nationality asks "Why am I still being kept here?"

    Reporters Without Borders has written twice to the French foreign ministry about the Iranian government's refusal to allow Mehrnoushe Solouki, a documentary filmmaker with French and Iranian dual nationality, to leave Iran.

     
    Mehrnoushe Solouki

    "Solouki is in a very difficult situation," the press freedom organisation said. "The Iranian authorities are saying nothing. While no charges were brought against her after she spent a month in detention, the Tehran prosecutor's office is awaiting a green light from the intelligence ministry to allow her to leave the country."

    Reporters Without Borders added: "Her family had to mortgage their home to pay the large amount of bail demanded for her release. This is just one more source of pressure on the young filmmaker, along with the many summonses for questioning that she has received since being set free."

    Reached by telephone, Solouki told Reporters Without Borders she did not understand the Iranian authorities' silence. "Why am I still being held in Iran?" she asked. "Didn't I have the consent and politically sacrosanct authorisations of Iranian officials to come to Iran? To spend time here and to film? Have I broken any rule, any of the rules laid down by the Islamic Republic? After an investigation, the Iranian judicial authorities concluded that I had not."

    Solouki added: "So why I am still being held in Iran? Am I guilty because I have French citizenship? Because I resided in Canada? Because I am an independent filmmaker? The interior ministry's silence does not bode well."

    Solouki went to Iran in December 2006 to make a documentary about the events that followed the 1988 cease-fire between Iraq and Iran. She was arrested on 17 February and was held in Evin prison. She was finally released on 19 March after payment of 100 million toumen (80,000 euros) in bail. Her French passport was returned to her after the French embassy intervened. But the Iranian authorities are still holding on to all her notes and a portable hard drive that contains 70 per cent of the film she shot.

    Parnaz Azima, a journalist with Iranian and American dual nationality who works for Radio Free Europe in the Czech Republic, is also currently barred from leaving Iran. She was accused of "propaganda against the Islamic Republic" and working for a "counter-revolutionary" radio station after she travelled to Iran in January to see her ailing mother. She has avoided imprisonment by paying the equivalent of 411,000 euros in bail but the authorities are holding on to her passport and she must remain in Iran until her trial takes place.

    Reporters Without Borders defends imprisoned journalists and press freedom throughout the world. It has nine national sections (Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). It has representatives in Bangkok, London, New York, Tokyo and Washington. And it has more than 120 correspondents worldwide.

    Related Web Site: Free Solouki

    Kilde: Payvand

    ACS Drops Iranian Members


     



    By: Prof. David N Rahni

    The American Chemical Society (ACS) has once again led the way, with its "zealot" interpretation of "embargo" by the Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control, by terminating the membership of its long-standing members in Iran, many of whom are post Ph.D. alumni of American Universities.

    Several years ago, the ACS undertook a similar unprecedented action, under the same law. Then, it unilaterally stopped accepting scholarly and research manuscripts from Iranian scientists for its three dozen periodicals in the publication division. However, later, under embarrassing pressure from the American scientific community and its membership, the ACS retracted its decision and agreed to take it up instead with the federal government.

    Paradoxically and notwithstanding rhetoric, such ill-conceived measures are against the current U.S. administration policy of promoting people-to-people contact as enunciated by the Assistant Secretary of State Nicholas Burns at the March 29 hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Yudhijit Bhattacharjee, in Science Magazine, reported that the ACS Assistant General Counsel, David Smorodin when "re-reading” the embargo rules, made the recommendation to terminate Iranian membership(Science Magazine, Vol. 315, 30 March 2007). One can not help but speculate whether or not such decision is truly serving the interests of member-based ACS or enforcing the laws to the limit as he has served as a U.S. Assistant District Attorney before joining the ACS.

    Nonetheless, despite the abrupt termination of individual membership of Iranian chemical scientists with no due process, the ACS has stated that while they [Iranians] can continue to purchase journals and other “non-sensitive” products at full-rate, the ACS might apply for a special license from the Treasury Department to reinstate their memberships. This has in the meantime deprived American chemists to learn about the scholarly contributions of their Iranian peers. It should be noted that as in the past, the American Physical Society (APS), in contrast, stated, "We have NO plan to do anything similar, and continue to serve our members in Iran”. Judy Franz, a director at the APS further stated that, "We would resist having to obtain a license to the extent we can”. When interviewed by Science Magazine, the official publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), David Rahni an Iranian-American chemistry professor in New York stated, "I, like most ACS members and peers in the scientific community, strongly question the ACS motive on this issue, and expect ACS’s leadership to refrain from allowing politics to taint the high stature the Organization has achieved." Rahni further stated that this has personally concerned him gravely since he has served the ACS with distinctions in the past thirty years, as typified by his positions as the chair of the ACS New York, the chair of the Middle Atlantic Regional Meeting, and the chair of Nichols Medal. 90% of the ACS projects, publications and activities are run by a huge cadre of volunteer professionals who, with no expectations, give their time, energy, money and intellects and talents to the advancement of the chemical sciences worldwide. It is painfully ironic to many, especially the ACS American members to witness the politicization of their disciplines through the ACS as they continue to register their grave concerns with the ACS lucratively remunerated executive directors. As a chemistry professor with having given fifty years of his life to the ACS and the profession so eloquently put it, “Never mind the Iranians as one may not give a darn about them and their plights, what, I am bewildered to speculate the ulterior motives of the ACS paid professional leadership is to embarrass us as freethinking scientists”. ACS is US and not its DC staff as they are required by our mandate to serve our interests and not create problems for us.

    The consensus among the nearly one million Americans of Iranian ancestry is to reaffirm their yearning commitment to the attainment of justice, security, stability, equity, transparency and human rights through "home-grown", indigenous and democratic reforms in Iran, but not at the expense of isolating the scientific community in their motherland from their peers worldwide. They further deplore any possible unilateral military action against Iran, as they firmly believe this is counter-productive to the organic, slow, but steady evolution of Iran through educational benchmark, cultural reforms and communication with the rest of the world. They further consider military action and/or isolation counter-productive to the credibility of their American homeland which would inevitably lead, once again, to the priceless loss of human life and loss of credibility for our nation in the international scene.

    Iran's chemist/chemical engineering professionals/scholars numbers tens of thousands. They are, by and large, members of the Iranian Chemical Society (www.ics-ir.org). However, many of them hold at least one overseas membership, mostly in the Royal Societies in the UK. There are currently 36 Iranian members in the American Chemical Society. The strong position of chemistry/chemical engineering in Iran is due to the oil and gas explorations by the petrochemical industry during the past 100 years, and due to some of Iran’s renowned past and contemporary chemists, scientists, and philosophers. The contributions of Americans of Iranian background to the chemistry and sciences, engineering and medicine, is unparalleled by other recent immigrant communities. There indeed exists an Iranian Chemists' Association of the ACS that since its inception in the 80, has reached out to over a thousand chemists of Iranian ancestry in the U.S. alone. It is well substantiated that as long as the diplomatic relations between the two nations remain at a hostile stalemate, a political cloud hovers over the personal and professional aspirations of Iranian-Americans. Specifically, senior and executive level professional opportunities for Iranian-Americans, particularly in government, higher education and the corporate world, remain chronically undermined.

    Iran, a multiethnic country of 70 million, traces its heritage to a long and illustrious history, 10,000 years in the making, with 2500 years of a continuous form of government. There are two million students in her higher education system, 60% of whom, especially in the sciences, engineering and medicine, are women. Its literacy rate is 90%, unprecedented in that part of the world. Iran or Persia as it was formerly known by the outside world until 1935, has indeed contributed immensely toward the advancement of science, technology and society for millennia. Rhazes, Avicenna, Algorithm, Omer Khayam, Farabi, Biruni, Hayyan, and many others are some of the epics that come to a western scholar’s mind.

    Despite the tremendous burden imposed on the Iranian students and scholars as they struggle to obtain a US visa (mostly denied) for doctoral studies, some of the brightest graduate students in Ivy League Universities (e.g., Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, and MIT) are Iranians. Increasingly, however, they opt to pursue their doctoral studies in Australia, Canada and Europe. Iranian high school students have continuously ranked among the top few of the nations in the International Chemistry and other Science Olympiads, and Robotics and Computing Competitions.

    Isn't it ironic that when the ACS claims to be an international professional society, 130 years old, with a membership of 160,000, 10% of whom are from overseas, and an additional 20%, are naturalized Americans or permanent residents, that it forces the nationals of Iran out, deprives them from maintaining scientific communications with peers worldwide, and does not let them contribute toward the advancement of science worldwide? Notwithstanding the rhetoric and provocations leading to a possible disastrous confrontation by governments, a true scientist, or a credible organization of scientists such as the ACS, which does not recognize the boundaries of the world, should be capable to transcend all political barriers for the advancement of science.

    David N. Rahni, Ph.D.
    Professor of Chemistry,
    Pace University,
    Pleasantville, New York
    Adjunct Professor of Dermatology,
    New York Medical College
    Adj. Prof. Env. Law, Pace U.
    www.sciencemag.org

    Prof Davood Rahni’s interview with the Iranian Student News Agency
    Depending on the reaction of the ACS, a petition is being worked on, which will be sent to you for possible endorsement by mid-next week.

    Davood Rahni
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    On the News
    SCIENCE VOL 315 30 MARCH 2007 1777
    ACS Drops Iranian Members, Citing Embargo The American Chemical Society (ACS) has Reluctantly rescinded the membership of Some 36 Iranian scientists after the society Determined that having members in Iran violates U.S. Law. The society hopes to reinstate Them after obtaining a government license, A step that could set a precedent for other U.S. Societies with Iranian members. U.S. Organizations are prohibited from Doing business with individuals in Iran, Cuba, and North Korea, but an exemption Permits the trade of informational materials. That provision allows U.S. Scholarly societies, whose journals are a major benefit to its overseas members, to retain ties to members in those countries. But ACS’s stance changed after Assistant General Counsel David Smorodin reread the embargo rules and concluded that selling publications to members at discount rates, a common practice, represents a service above and beyond the trade of informational materials. He also believes that membership benefits such as “insurance, career counseling, invitation to meetings, and educational opportunities” are not exempt under the rules; although he acknowledges that overseas members typically do not use those privileges. “We had no choice as a federally chartered organization but to comply with the law”, says Smorodin, adding that his interpretation of the regulations did not “win [me] any friends within the ACS”. In January, ACS’s membership office informed the society’s 36 Iranian members that their memberships were being discontinued, although they could still purchase materials from the society at the full rate. The move angered David Rahni, an Iranian-American chemistry professor at Pace University in Pleasantville, New York, and an ACS member, who says ACS should “refrain from allowing politics” to get in the way of scientific openness. Smorodin says the society will soon apply for a license from the Department of Commerce,s Office of Foreign Assets Control allowing it to serve its Iranian members. Other associations are troubled by ACS’s Proposed solution. “We have no plans to do anything similar,” says Judy Franz of the American Physical Society in College Park, Maryland, which also has members in Iran. “We would resist having to obtain a license to the extent we can.”

    ACS is forced to drop Iranian members because of U.S. Regulations
    Chemical & Engineering News, Latest News April 9, 2007 Volume 85, Number 15 P. 11

    Embargo Fallout ACS is forced to drop Iranian members because of U.S. Regulations William Schulz The American Chemical Society has confirmed that, in January, it was forced to drop 36 members of the society who live in Iran because of the terms of a U.S. Embargo against Iran and other nations. ACS officials say they came to the decision after careful legal review indicated that the society was running afoul of the regulations, which are administered by the Treasury Department. "We regretted having to do this, and we will get it sorted out," says ACS Executive Director and CEO Madeleine Jacobs. She says the society is working to reinstate the Iranian members by applying for a license from the U.S. Government. Jacobs adds that the breadth of services that come with ACS membership "distinguish us in important ways" from other scientific societies with regard to the Treasury Department rules. Nonetheless, she says she plans to be in touch with her counterparts at other scientific societies to explain the ACS decision. The regulations do not permit ACS to provide members in Iran with services or benefits beyond the receipt of journals and other publications, says ACS Assistant General Counsel David T. Smorodin. Even providing publications becomes problematic, he says, if the society offers them at a discounted member rate. "Chemists around the world network through ACS," says Ali Banijamali, chair of the board of directors of the Iranian Chemists' Association of ACS. With the Treasury Department rules, he says, "politics is prohibiting this collaboration."

    Chemical & Engineering News ISSN 0009-2347 Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society

    Guantánamo Bay - a Human Rights scandal

    Guantánamo Bay - a Human Rights scandal

    Detainees in Guantánamo Bay
    Detainees in Guantánamo Bay
    © US Department of Defense

    In January 2002, the US authorities transferred the first "war on terror" detainees – hooded and shackled – to the US Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Despite a major international outcry and expert condemnation, hundreds of people of around 30 nationalities remain there.

    Denied their rights under international law and held in conditions which may amount to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, the detainees face severe psychological distress. Three have died at the camp, after apparently committing suicide. Others have gone on prolonged hunger strikes, being kept alive only through painful force feeding measures.

    As more evidence surfaces that the abuse of Guantánamo detainees has been widespread, condemnation at home and abroad increases. Amnesty International was one of the first voices to call for the camp to be closed, and many other organizations, institutions and individuals have since expressed their outrage at its existence. Even US President George W. Bush has said that he would like to close Guantánamo. He should do it as a matter of urgency.


    Secret detention and enforced disappearance


    Many of those held in Guantánamo were captured during the international conflict in Afghanistan. Others were picked up outside any zones of armed conflict in countries as diverse as Gambia, Bosnia, Egypt, Indonesia and Thailand.

    The US Government should close the Guantánamo Bay detention facilities without further delay.
    UN report on Guantánamo Bay, February 2006

    In early September 2006, US authorities transferred to Guantánamo 14 men who had been held in secret CIA custody. President George W. Bush finally admitted that, in the "war on terror", the USA has been resorting to secret detentions and enforced disappearance, which is a crime under international law.


    Inhuman and illegal detention

    Released detainees and others still in the camp have alleged that they have been subjected to torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment while detained by US authorities at Guantánamo or elsewhere.

    Some of the detainees are still held in maximum security blocks, sometimes for up to 24 hours a day and with very little out-of-cell exercise time. The detainees have also been subjected to repeated interrogations sometimes for hours at a time and without the presence of a lawyer, raising fears that statements may have been extracted under coercion. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is still the only non-governmental organization allowed access to the detainees.

    With the prospect of indefinite detention without a fair trial in such conditions, the potential psychological impact upon those held and their loved ones is a major concern. The camp is condemning thousands of people across the world to a life of suffering, torment and stigmatisation.

    Soldier watching over prisoners in Guantánamo Bay
    Soldier watching over detainees in Guantánamo Bay
    © US Department of Defense

    Presumption of guilt

    None of the Guantánamo detainees have been convicted of any criminal charge. Hundreds of them have been released from the base without charge or any form of compensation for the many years they were illegally detained at Guantánamo.

    Yet the US authorities still label those held as "enemy combatants", "terrorists", or "the worst of the worst", flouting their right to be presumed innocent and illegally justifying the denial of many of their most basic human rights.

    None of the Guantánamo detainees have been granted prisoner of war status or brought before a "competent tribunal" to determine his status, as required by international law. The US government refuses to clarify their legal status.


    Military commissions

    In November 2001, President Bush signed a Military Order establishing trials by military commission which had the power to hand down death sentences and against whose decision there was no right of appeal to any court.

    On 29 June 2006, the US Supreme Court ruled that US President George W. Bush had overstepped his authority in ordering Military Commissions trials, and maintained that the proposed commissions violated US law and the Geneva conventions.

    The decision was based on the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a 36-year-old Yemeni national who has spent four years in the US detention centre.

    The ruling was a victory for the rule of law and human rights and Amnesty International called on the US government to use it a a springboard for bringing all its "war on terror" detention policies into full compliance of US and international law.

    Remember, these are – the ones in Guantánamo Bay are killers. They don’t share the same values we share
    President Bush, 20 March 2002

    Instead, on 29 September 2006 the US Congress gave its stamp of approval to human rights violations committed by the USA by passing the Military Commissions Act, a new legislation to try foreign nationals held in Guantánamo. President Bush signed the Act on 17 October 2006.


    More of the same: from bad executive policy to bad domestic law

    The Military Commissions Act leaves the USA squarely on the wrong side of international law.

    The Act is discriminatory because it provides for trials of the "enemy" in front of military commissions using lower standards of evidence than apply to US personnel. It also grants the US President the power to hand down death sentences. Whether charged for trial or not, those detained by the USA as "enemy combatants" will not be able to challenge the lawfulness or conditions of their detention in habeas corpus appeals.

    Prisoners in Guantánamo Bay
    Detainees in Guantánamo Bay
    © US Department of Defense

    Amnesty International is campaigning for repeal of this act.


    Releases with protection

    Amnesty International calls for and welcomes releases of detainees from the base, if they are not to be charged and brought to fair trial. But they must not be returned to any country where they would be at risk of torture, execution or other serious human rights abuses. All transfers should be with the informed consent of the individuals concerned.

    In the cases of serious concerns about the fate of released detainees, the US authorities should intensify efforts to find a country where released detainees can live without risk of further human rights violations, in cooperation with the UN refugee agency (UNCHR). Third countries should consider accepting detainees who voluntarily seek resettlement, especially countries of former habitual residence or where detainees had close family or other ties.


     

    Close Guantánamo!

    US Military Police escort detainee. Camp Delta, Guantánamo Bay
© APGraphicsBank

    US Military Police escort detainee. Camp Delta, Guantánamo Bay
    © APGraphicsBank

    It is now over five years since the first detainees were transferred to the detention camp at the US Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

    Despite widespread international condemnation, hundreds of people of more than 30 nationalities are still there: without charge, and with little hope of obtaining a fair trial.

    Enough is enough!

    Guantánamo Bay is a symbol of injustice and abuse.

    It must be closed down.

    Latest
    Press release: New AI report condemns conditions in Guantánamo

    Report: David Hicks pleads guilty on one count. AI observer attends arraignment at Guantánamo

    Case-sheet 20: Pakistani national Majid Khan

    Case-sheet 19: Saudi Arabian national Yousef al-Shehri

    Get involved
    Close Guantánamo flotilla © AI

    Join the close
    Guantánamo flotilla! and invite your friends to travel with you on-line to confront injustice!


    Multimedia
    Slideshow on the impact of Guantánamo on the detainees and their families

    Say 'Close Guantánamo' on camera! And watch here a compilation of some of the videos filmed by other people

    Key documents
    Briefing: Close Guantánamo - symbol of injustice

    Report:
    A framework for closing Guantánamo Bay detention centre



    Ending Guantánamo Bay detentions

     © Freedom for UK resident Bisher al-Rawi
    Bisher al-Rawi expressed his gratitude to AI, saying:
    "AI and its good work throughout the world is a blooming flower of hope. I sincerely believe that without Amnesty’s immediate intervention in our case during those extremely difficult first days after our arrest in the Gambia, we probably would have been goners."

    Real lives

    Rabia is the wife of Majid Khan, a detainee transferred to Guantánamo from secret CIA custody

    Moazzam Begg © AIMy husband was kidnapped over three years ago, and in this period I have not known anything about his whereabouts (...) Recently I have found out that he has been transferred to Guantánamo. I am very happy that he's alive, but it's a shock because I've heard a lot about what happens there.

    More cases
     
    BLOG: Activism from our national offices

    Close Guantánamo action, AI France, 2005. @ AI/ Pierre Gleizes
    AI France, 2005. @ AI/ Pierre Gleizes
    Read about the Close Guantánamo! actions around the world in our activism blog.

    Læs også:


    http://web.amnesty.org/pages/guantanamobay-cases-eng

    http://web.amnesty.org/pages/guantanamobay-library-eng

    http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-usa/index




    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL URGENT ACTION CALL FOR SA'ID QANBAR ZAHI (17)

     

     

    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL URGENT ACTION CALL FOR SA'ID QANBAR ZAHI (17)

     A word of thanks to Amnesty International for their timely response to our request to issue a world Wide Urgent Action statement regarding imminent execution of the 17 year old sa'id Qanbar zahi (also reported as Saeed Kamberzai):

     

     

    URGENT ACTION CALL

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    PUBLIC  AI Index: MDE 13/034/2007 
    22 March 2007

    UA 76/07 Fear of imminent execution/ torture

    IRAN 

     

    Sa'id Qanbar Zahi (m), aged 17 ] 
    Javad Naroui (m)  ]
     Ma'soud Nosrat Zahi (m)  ]
     Houshang Shahnavazi (m) ] All members of Iran's Baluchi minority
     Yahya Sohrab Zahi (m) ] 
     Ali Reza Brahoui (m) ]
     Abdalbek Kahra Zahi (also  ]
     known as  Abdalmalek) (m)
     

     

    The seven people named above, including a boy aged 17, are at risk of imminent execution. Amnesty International fears that at least five of the group may have been tortured into "confessing" to involvement in a number of violent crimes carried out in the town of Tasuki, in Sistan-Baluchistan province, southern Iran, in March 2006.

    Information provided to Amnesty International suggests that the seven may have been arrested on account of their family ties with those suspected of having been involved in blowing up a bus carrying security officials from the Revolutionary Guard on 14 February 2007, in which at least 14 people were killed.

     

    According to media reports, Ali Reza Brahoui, Yahya Sohrab Zahi, Sa'id Qanbar Zahi, Houshang Shahnavazi and Ma'soud Nosrat Zahi all made "confessions" on Iranian state television to a number of crimes which allegedly took place in Sistan-Baluchistan, including attacks and carjackings. The televised "confessions" linked an Iranian Baluchi armed opposition group, Jondallah, also known as the Iranian Peoples' Resistance Movement (Jonbesh-e Moqavemat-e Mardom-e Iran), to these crimes, and to the attack on the bus on 14 February. Unconfirmed reports suggest that the five who "confessed" have been tortured, including by having bones in their hands and feet broken; by being 'branded' with a red-hot iron and by an electric drill applied to their limbs, shredding their muscles.

     

    According to a BBC report, Iranian state television said that Sa'id Qanbar Zahi was tried on 11 March 2006. Amnesty International has no other information concerning the legal proceedings faced by the seven, but there are concerns that they may have faced summary trials, and may not have had access to defence lawyers.

     

    Amnesty International recognizes the rights and responsibilities of governments to bring to justice those suspected of criminal offences, but opposes the death penalty in all cases as the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. Moreover, Iran is a state party to international treaties which prohibit the execution of those under the age of 18 at the time of their alleged offence.

     

    BACKGROUND INFORMATION

    Iran's Baluchi minority lives mainly in the southeast of the country, and is believed to constitute between one and three percent of the total population of around 70 million. Mainly Sunni Muslims, they have for many years complained of discrimination by the Iranian authorities.

     

    Jondallah, or the Iranian Peoples' Resistance Movement, has carried out a number of armed attacks on Iranian officials and has on occasion killed hostages. It reportedly seeks to defend the rights of the Baluchi people, though government officials have claimed that it is involved in drug smuggling and has ties to terrorist groups and to foreign governments. Amnesty International condemns unequivocally the killing of hostages and urges Jondallah to desist from this or similar practices immediately.

     

    According to a BBC report on 15 March, Sistan-Baluchistan television has stated that at least two people have been hanged in connection with the attack on the bus carrying Revolutionary Guards. Five days after it took place, an Iranian Baluchi man, Nasrollah Shanbeh-Zehi, was executed in connection with the attack. He was shown on Iranian television "confessing" to the bombing on behalf of Jondallah and was executed in public at the site of the bombing. It is thought that the other man allegedly executed in connection with the attack may have been Ahmad Sariz, allegedly a member of Jondallah, who was reportedly hanged on 14 March. Reports indicate that at least 17 other individuals have either been sentenced to death or executed in connection with an attack in Tasuki in March 2006, in which up to 22 people were reportedly killed. In an interview with the Iranian newspaper 'Ayyaran on 17 March, Hossein Ali Shahryari, a parliamentarian representing the city of Zahedan, stated that prisons in Sistan-Baluchistan province hold more than 700 people under sentence of death. In 2006, at least 177 people were executed in Iran, including at least four women and four people who were under 18 at the time of the alleged offence. Possibly as many as one-third of these were members of Iran's Baluchi minority.

     

    RECOMMENDED ACTION:

     

     Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible, in English, Persian or your own language:

    - stating that Amnesty International recognizes the right and responsibility of governments to bring to justice those suspected of criminal offences, but opposes the death penalty as the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment;

    - calling on the Iranian authorities to commute immediately the death sentences of these seven individuals (naming them) and of anyone else facing execution in Iran;

    - reminding the authorities of their commitment to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that "sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age", and calling on the Iranian authorities to implement the recommendations of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child by immediately stopping the executions of those who were under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged offence; 

    - expressing concern at reports that they may have faced torture, in contravention of Iran's own laws and its international obligations;

    - expressing concern at reports that the men have been arrested for being related to those suspected of carrying out armed attacks against government security officials;
    - seeking details of the charges and any trial proceedings that the individuals named may have faced.

     

    APPEALS TO:


    Leader of the Islamic Republic
    Ayatollah Sayed 'Ali Khamenei, Leader of the Islamic Republic
    The Office of the Supreme Leader, Shahid Keshvar Doost Street, Tehran. Islamic Republic of Iran
    Fax: +98 251 7774 2228 (mark "For the Office of His Excellency, Ayatollah Khamenei")
    Email:  Via website, in English:
    http://www.leader.ir/langs/EN/index.php?p'sendletter
    Salutation: Your Excellency
     
    Head of the Judiciary
    Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi
    Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Justice Building, Panzdah-Khordad Square, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
    Fax: + 98 21 3390 4986 (please keep trying; send appeals by post or email if you cannot get through)
    Email:
    info@dadgostary-tehran.ir (In the subject line write: For the attention of Ayatollah Shahroudi)
    Salutation: Your Excellency

     

    Governor of Sistan and Balochistan province
    Mr Dahmarde, Governor
    Fax: +98 541 3231990
    E-mail:
    info@sb-ostan.ir
    Salutation: Dear Sir

    and to diplomatic representatives of Iran accredited to your country.

    PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY. Check with the International Secretariat, or your section office, if sending appeals after 3 May 2007.

     

    Child offender at risk of execution

    Worldwide Appeal

    IRAN: Child offender at risk of execution

    Delara Darabi © www.myspace.com/helpdelara

     

     

    Important

    Please read our letter writing guide before writing to any of the addresses below.

    Reminder

    AI members should not send appeals to the authorities of their own countries.

     

    Appeal status: Active
    Appeal started: March 2007

    Delara Darabi, aged 20, is at risk of imminent execution for a murder which took place when she was 17 years old. She has reportedly been sentenced to death for a second time after her case was retried. She reportedly attempted to commit suicide in prison in January 2007.

    Delara Darabi was initially sentenced to death by Branch 10 of the General Court in the northern city of Rasht. The Supreme Court later found “deficiencies” in her case and ordered a retrial. However, following two trial sessions in January and June 2006, Delara Darabi was sentenced to death for a second time by Branch 107 of the General Court in Rasht. Her death sentence was reportedly confirmed by the Supreme Court in February 2007 and so she could be executed at any time.

    According to reports, Delara Darabi and a 19-year-old man named Amir Hossein broke into the house of Delara Darabi’s elderly female relative to commit a burglary. Amir Hossein allegedly killed the woman during the burglary. Delara Darabi initially confessed to the murder, but subsequently retracted her confession. She claims that Amir Hossein asked her to admit responsibility for the murder to protect him from execution, believing that as she was under the age of 18, she could not be sentenced to death.

    To find out more about the death penalty in Iran see article in the Wire March 2007-
    Child offender’s death sentence quashed in Iran.

    http://web.amnesty.org/wire/March2007/DP

    Please write, urging the authorities to commute the death sentence imposed on Delara Darabi immediately. Remind the authorities of their commitment to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that “sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age.”

    Send appeals to:
    Ayatollah Sayed ‘Ali Khamenei
    The Office of the Supreme Leader
    Shoahada Street
    Qom
    Iran
    Email: info@leader.ir and istiftaa@wilayah.org
    Salutation: Your Excellency

    http://web.amnesty.org/appeals/index/irn-010307-wwa-eng

    Death penalty news update

    Death penalty news update                                                                                     

    The Congress was organized by Together Against the Death Penalty which acts as the Secretariat for the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty and numerous other partners including AI.
    © AI / Ilya van Marle


    Death penalty experts meet in Paris

    The Third World Congress against the Death Penalty took place in Paris, France, from 1-3 February. “Paris 2007” brought together over 600 abolitionists and decision-makers from all over the world.

    AI’s delegation included experts from the International Secretariat, as well as death penalty coordinators from around the world – from Canada to Germany, Japan to Tunisia.

    Delegates focused on the prospects for abolition in North Africa, the Asia Pacific region and the Middle East, including reforms of the political and legal process in those regions. Major debates included “Islam and the death penalty” and “China, the death penalty and the Olympic Games”.

    The Congress heard from those profoundly affected by the death penalty, including exonerated former death row inmates, the families of condemned prisoners and relatives of murder victims who campaign against the death penalty.

    The event ended on Saturday with a march of hundreds of people through the streets of Paris, entitled “Say No to the death penalty”.

    For more information, see
    www.abolition.fr/ecpm/english/congres.php

    Child offender’s death sentence quashed in Iran

    Mahabad Fatehi, known as Nazanin, no longer faces execution following a retrial of her case. The 19-year-old was cleared of pre-meditated murder by a Tehran criminal court on 14 January, but was ordered to pay diyeh (blood money) to the family of the man she killed in self-defence in March 2005. Aged 17 at the time of the crime, she was nevertheless sentenced to death in January 2006 and remained at risk of execution. However, international protests led to her death sentence being quashed in May 2006 and her case was sent for retrial (see the Wire October 2006).

    The outcome of Nazanin’s case highlights the urgent need for legal reform in Iran to stop executing child offenders – those who are aged below 18 at the time of the crime.

    For several years now, the Iranian authorities have been considering passing legislation banning the use of the death penalty for child offenders. A bill establishing special courts for children and adolescents was reportedly passed in summer 2006, but has yet to be approved by the Council of Guardians, which is charged with ensuring that Iran’s legislation conforms with Islamic principles.

    As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Iran is prohibited from executing anyone for an offence committed when they were under the age of 18. However, AI has recorded 22 executions of child offenders in Iran since 1990. Currently, at least 24 child offenders reportedly remain on death row in Iran.

    To take action, see
    Worldwide Appeal on Iran.

    Former death row inmate describes ordeal to AI


    Juan Meléndez spent 17 years on Florida’s death row in the USA for a crime he did not commit. Exonerated in 2002, he has since campaigned widely for the abolition of the death penalty. “I think it is my duty to fight against the death penalty,” he told AI. “To me it is very personal.”

    Juan Meléndez was arrested in 1984 on charges of murder and armed robbery. He was convicted within a matter of days. “The trial started on Monday,” he recalled. “Wednesday, the evidence came in… Thursday they found me guilty. Friday they sentenced me to death. This is all in the same week.”

    The conviction came despite the prosecution’s lack of physical evidence in the case and several witnesses testifying to Juan Meléndez’ innocence. “I had alibi witnesses,” he said. “I had witnesses corroborating the testimony... I had witnesses saying the police informant had a grudge against me.”

    He continued: “All my witnesses were from the African-American race – black men and black ladies. I guess that played an important part. They didn’t believe them.”

    In December 2001, his conviction was overturned after a judge ruled that the prosecution had withheld critical evidence.

    This year marks the 30th anniversary of the resumption of executions in the USA following a 10-year hiatus. In those 30 years, more than 1,000 prisoners have been executed and over 100 prisoners have been freed from death row after being found innocent.

    For Juan Meléndez, the abolition of the death penalty is a goal he will not relinquish. “I will not stop talking until it’s abolished,” he said. “The death penalty is cruel, it’s racist, it’s unnecessary. We can have justice without it. I believe it’s our duty as human beings to not only say, I don’t believe in the death penalty, but to act against it.”

    See also
    USA: The experiment that failed – a reflection on 30 years of executions (AMR 51/011/2007).

    ACT NOW!
    Go to:
    www.amnesty.org/deathpenalty


    Death penalty news in brief

    Asia Pacific launches a regional anti-death penalty network


    Activists, non-governmental organizations, civil society groups and lawyers across the Asia-Pacific region joined together to launch the Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN) – on the fourth World Day against the Death Penalty, 10 October 2006.

    ADPAN works across the region to raise public awareness about the inequalities and unfairness of the death penalty.

    The network was established at an AI Consultative Meeting in Hong Kong in July 2006 and includes members from India, Indonesia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand and other countries in the region.

    Go to:
    www.asiapacific.amnesty.org

    Executions continue in Japan

    Four men – one aged 77 – were executed on 25 December 2006.

    These executions send a discouraging signal to countries in the region at a time when others – South Korea and Taiwan for example – are considering the abolition of the death penalty. The death penalty has already been abolished in Cambodia, Nepal, Timor-Leste and recently in the Philippines.

    See
    Will this day be my last?’ The death penalty in Japan (ASA 22/006/2006).


    Four executed in Saudi Arabia


    Four Sri Lankan men were executed on 19 February, bringing the total number of those executed so far this year to at least 17 people.

    According to an official statement by the Ministry of Interior, all four men were beheaded, for their part in a series of violent armed robberies. The death sentences had reportedly been upheld on appeal.

    AI fears that other executions may be imminent and urges King Abdullah to commute all death sentences.

    See
    Worldwide Appeal April 2006.
     

     

    @amnesty.org

    Demonstration mod krig lørdag 17. marts - København, Århus, Odense, Aalborg og Rønne + Les Roberts til København

     

     

    læs også om Iraq violence Facts and figures :
    Underskriv samlig:Stop besættelsen af IrakTræk de danske tropper hjem nu

     

     

    Hermed en opfordring til at deltage i demonstrationerne på lørdag ved 4-året
    for starten på Irak-krigen.
    + Vi vil gerne gøre opmærksom på, at en af forfatterne bag Lancet-rapporten,
    Les Roberts, kommer til København (se nederst)
    Videresend gerne til venner og bekendte!


    Fogh blev presset til at trække de fleste danske tropper hjem fra Irak - til
    august.
    Det er en vigtig del-sejr for den folkelige krigsmodstand og det skal
    fejres.

    Men Bush's krige fortsætter - og Fogh-regeringen bakker stadig op om dem.
    Og den danske regering har stadig tropper i såvel Afghanistan som Irak.
    Derfor er der stadig nye opgaver for fredsbevægelsen.

    A man mourns his son Friday in Baqubah, a city north of Baghdad. The child died in random gunfire near a family home in the village of Khan Bani Saad.

    Der er demonstrationer på lørdag i København, Århus, Odense, Aalborg og
    Rønne.

    Tid og sted følger herunder - se detaljerne på:
    <url:
    http://www.nejtilkrig.dk/20070317/>


    København
    ---------
    Demonstrationen starter ved USA's ambassade, Dag Hammarskjölds Allé 24,
    Østerbro, kl. 12.
    Herfra går den til Axeltorv
    Arr.: Kirkmand-initiativet og Nej til krig

    For-demonstration fra Blågårds Plads kl. 11.00
    Herfra til USAs ambassade.
    Arr.: Unge mod krig

    For-demonstration fra Christiania kl. 11.00
    Afgang fra Carl Madsens Plads, Christiania, kl.11.00
    Herfra til USAs ambassade.
    Arr.: Christiania for fred
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    Århus
    -----
    Demonstrationen starter på Rådhuspladsen kl. 13.
    Arr.: Århus mod Krig og Terror, LO, SF, Enhedslisten, KP, KPiD og DKP

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    Odense
    ------
    Demonstrationen starter på Flakhaven kl. 12.
    Arr.: SF, Enhedslisten, LO Odense, Nej til krig

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    Aalborg
    -------
    Demonstrationen starter på Gammeltorv kl. 12.
    Arr.: Aalborg Fredsaktion

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    Rønne
    -----
    Demonstrationen starter på Store Torv kl. 12.


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----


    Les Roberts til København 22. marts
    -----------------------------------

    Debatmøde: En krig og dens ofre
    Mød dr. Les Roberts, Columbia University, forskeren bag Lancet-rapporten om
    Irak-krigens ofre
    Torsdag den 22. mar kl. 19.30
    Borups Højskole, Frederiksholms Kanal 24

    De danske soldater skal hjem fra Irak, men krigen fortsætter og uskyldige
    dør stadig hver dag.
    Dr. Les Roberts, chef for Health Policy i International Rescue Comittee og
    epidemiolog ved Columbia University, er chefforsker bag det hidtil
    grundigste studie af Irak-krigens menneskelige omkostninger, offentliggjort
    i det ansete tidsskrift The Lancet.

    Dr. Les Roberts fortæller om undersøgelsen, debatten og om sit syn på
    Irak-krigen.
    Deltagelse kr. 50 betales ved indgangen. Tilmelding på tlf. 33696153 eller
    mail

    Arr.: Luftskibet - Dagbladet Information
    <url:
    http://luftskibet.information.dk>
    Kirkmand-initiativet
    <url:
    http://www.kirkmand-initiativet.dk>

    Se mere om Lancet-rapporten på:
    <url:
    http://www.nejtilkrig.dk/200610_lancet/>


    Mvh. Jørn


    --
    Nej til Krig
    www.nejtilkrig.dk
    kontor@nejtilkrig.dk
    -

    Jørn Andersen
    Ærtevej 21, st. th.
    DK-2700 Brønshøj
    +45-38816766 (tlf.)
    +45-40300210  (mobil)

    Women's Rights Defenders Now in Solitary Confinement, Deemed A Threat To Iran's National Security

     
     
     
    Læs også:
     
     
     
     
    Women's Rights Defenders Now in Solitary Confinement, Deemed A Threat To Iran's National Security
    3/12/07
    Shadi Sadr and Mahboubeh Abasgholizadeh have been arraigned, charged with being a “threat to national security,” and remanded on March 11 by Evin Ward 209 interrogators authorized by the Ministry of Intelligence of Islamic Republic of Iran. Sadr and Abasgholizadeh are the only two women who still remain in custody after their arrest last week. Thirty-one other women were also arrested but have been gradually released on bail (cash or bond). Sadr is a lawyer and women’s rights defender and was arrested while performing her duty defending the women activists on March 4th.
     
     
    Shadi Sadr
    Shadi Sadr is a prominent lawyer, journalist, and activist. She founded

    Zanan-e Iran, the first website dedicated to the work of Iranian women's
    rights activists, and she has written numerous articles and several books
    on the subject of Iranian women and their legal rights. Shadi Sadr has
    represented a number of persecuted activists and journalists and has
    donated her time in successfully overturning the convictions of several
    women sentenced to execution.
     
     
    Jila Baniyaghoub
    Jila Baniyaghoub is a well-known journalist. She is the editor of the
    website of the Iranian Women's Society and the editor of the society
    and women's sections of Sarmaye newspaper . She is best-known
    for her book on Iranian women's journalism and for her reports from
    Iraq and Afghanistan.
     
     
    Based on the Criminal Procedure Laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran, at any point in the investigation, the interrogator is authorized to issue a remand and extend the temporary detention until the date of the trial. If not in agreement, the prosecutor has the power to appeal the interrogator’s remand to the court system. If the prosecutor does agree with the order of detention – which is often the case – it is very difficult and almost impossible for the prisoners to appeal the collective decision of the prosecutor and the interrogator. As such both Sadr and Abasgholizadeh continue to be in detention since their arrest on March 4th, 2007 without any likely prospect of being released.
     
    Throughout their detention, Sadr and Abasgholizadeh have been interrogated in the absence of their lawyers (Mohammad Mostafaei, Farideh Gheirat, and Elham Fahimi) and were denied the right to speak with them. Furthermore, the detainees are unaware that the interrogator and the prosecutor have refused to speak with their lawyers. In the face of such confusion and the absence of any legal representation, the detainees themselves have been unable to ask for a court hearing. 
     
    Abasgholizadeh has been held incommunicado since her arrest. Sadr has had two short telephone conversations with her husband, the last of which was on Saturday, March 10. Sadr’s husband, Hossein Nilchian, who contacted the Revolutionary Court authorities on March 11, has confirmed this. 
     
    The families of the two have been denied all visitation rights and are extremely alarmed, especially considering the women’s medical conditions. According to other women who have recently been released from Evin Ward 209, Sadr and Abasgholizadeh have no access to medical care. Sadr is suffering from chronic stomach ulcer. Abasgholizadeh suffers from arthritis and migraine headaches.
     
    Those recently released described the cells as being damp and very cold. To make matters worse there are no toilets in the cell. As a routine measure, the prisoners are deprived of warmth, since they are given only one blanket and forced to sleep on the cold floor. Mahnaz Mohammadi, who was arrested on March 4th and recently released, is still suffering from pneumonia. Moreover, those in custody have reportedly been interrogated while blindfolded during the night, and thus, have had little if any sleep.
     
    Article 27 of Iran’s Constitution guarantees the citizens’ right to assemble peacefully, which is precisely what the women defenders were doing. However, the interrogator/prosecutor claim that their peaceful gathering was instead a threat to Iran’s national security. As such Sadr and Abasgholizadeh were charged according to Chapter 16, Article 113 of the Islamic Penal Code: “Whenever two or more people gather and plan to commit a crime against the internal or external security of the country or facilitate the implementation of a crime, … then they will be sentenced to two to five years of imprisonment.” http://www.ghavanin.ir/detail.asp?id=6955
     
    The women’s rights advocates have become one of the main targets of the recently increased violation of human rights and the rising repression on the civil rights in the name of “national security”. Another concern is that certain intelligence authorities seem to be after plotting a “corruption and moral scandal” against some prominent women detainees in order to defame and de-legitimize women’s rights cause in the eyes of the larger public.
     
    Sadr and Abasgholizadeh are prominent activists and women rights defenders who have organized the Stop Stoning Forever Campaign, which aims to abolish stoning as a legal form of punishment for adultery. After exposing two incidents of stoning and identifying 10 more individuals condemned to be stoned, the campaign has successfully saved the lives of three women and one man.
     
     
     
     
    The campaign has been launched immediately after the arrest of women activists by a group of transnational activists. For more information about the campaign and the complete list of supporters, please visit the site:
     
     
    Contacts for Updated and Detailed Information:
     
    The Free Women’s Rights Defenders in Iran Campaign coordinators are ready to provide detailed information about the status of women detainees.
     
    The coordinators are able and willing to put reporters and news agencies in touch with the families and lawyers of the women in custody:

    Dr. Soheila Vahdati, soheilavahdati@gmail.com
    Sanam Dolatshahi, sanamdi@gmail.com
    Dr. Homa Hoodfar, homa.hoodfar@gmail.com

    ICSASPP names the coming Iranian New Year as the

     

    The Iranian New Year is the manifestation of love for human-beings and respect for

    peace and human rights

     

    The right to preserve a nation's historical and cultural   heritage  

    is a part of universal human rights

     

     

    Læs også:

    http://www.savepasargad.com/aa.from%20091806/January/Following%20the%20footsteps%20of%20taliban.htm

     

     

    ICSASPP names the coming Iranian New Year as the

    "Year of Pasargad"

                    

     

    For farsi se:

    http://www.savepasargad.com/aa.from%20091806/March/saal%20now%20saal%20Pasargad.htm

    In a few weeks, and on the advent of spring, Nowruz, the New Year of Iranians, will arrive. This is an ancient Iranian festivity which is still observed by all Iranians, as well as many other nations that once belonged to the Persian Empire. Numerous natural, social and political incidents have not been able to wipe this profound occasion from the Iranian culture. The reason for this persistence lies in the fact that Nowruz is based on the central ideas of Love, Light, Development, Humanism and Peace.

    One of the ancient locations that housed such great ideas was the Pasargad Plain, the very place that gave birth to the idea of Human Rights and initiated the history of Iran on such a proud foundation.

    This great place is now in danger of being wiped from the face of the earth due to the imminent flooding of a dam that has been built right in the heart of Bolaghi Gorge and Pasargad Plain, threatening to harm the mausoleum of Cyrus the Great as well – The very human being who realized the idea of Human Rights in his famous declaration 2500 years ago.

    ICSASPP, that was set up to prevent such a disaster, named the previous Iranian year as the "Year of Pasargad" in the hope of attracting the attention of people all over the globe who believe in the importance of cultural heritages of nations, as well as the responsible world organizations, to this cause.

    Now, getting closer to yet another Iranian new year, the danger still exists and the project of the destruction of the Iranian cultural heritage is still on the table. It is based on this real threat that ICSASPP has decided to name the new Iranian year as the "Year of Pasargad" again, asking all Iranians and non-Iranians who oppose such uncivilized action to elevate their endeavors in this direction by helping our Committee in whatever way they can think of.

    We wish everyone a very happy "New Year of Pasargad" - a year that could see the eradication of such unwanted threat to the Iranian ancient heritage.

    March 10, 2007

    ICSASPP

    www.savepasargad.com

    http://www.savepasargad.com/aa.from%20091806/March/Year%20of%20Pasargad.htm

    The First Declaration of Human Rights

     

     

    Se filmen her:

      http://www.spentaproductions.com/Cyrus-the-Great-English/cyruspreview_english.htm

     

     

    The World's First Charter of the Human Rights

     

    Language:

    Akkadian

     

    Medium:

    Clay cylinder

     

    Size:

    23 cm long   - 11 cm wide

     

    Length:

    40+ lines of writing (although broken)

     

    Date:

    538 BCE

     

    Cyrus the Great' reign:

    557–529 BCE

     

    Place of Discovery:

    Nineveh (nowadays Iraq)

     

    Date of Discovery:

    1879

     

    Discoverer:

    Hormuzd Rassam

     

    Current Location:

    British Museum

     

    Inventory number:

    BM WAA 90920
    (BM = British Museum; WAA = Western Asiastic Antiquities

     

     

     

     

    The First Declaration of Human Rights

                                                  

     


    Author: Dr. Darius Jahanian

     

    of the significant events in ancient history is the conquest of Babylon by the Persian king, Cyrus the Great.

    On October 4th, 539 BC, the Persian Army entered the city of Babylon, which was then the capital of the Babylonian state (in central Iraq). This was a bloodless campaign and no prisoners were One taken. Later, on November 9th, King Cyrus of Persia visited the city. Babylonian history tells us that Cyrus was greeted by the people, who spread a pathway of green twigs before him as a sign of honor and peace (sulmu). Cyrus greeted all Babylonians in peace and brought peace to their city.

    On this great event, Cyrus issued a declaration, inscribed on a clay barrel known as Cyrus's inscription cylinder. It was discovered in 1879 by Hormoz Rassam in Babylon and today is kept in the British Museum. Many historians have reviewed it as the first declaration of human rights.

    The Babylonian annals, as well as the first section of the Cyrus' inscription, shed light on the religiopolitical plight that had angered the people of Babylon and why they invited Cyrus's military campaign. Evidently, the Babyloninan king, Nabonidus, eliminated the festival of the new year and Nebo (one of the gods) was not brought into the city, and Bel (another god) was not taken in the procession of the festival. Also, the worship of Marduk, the king of the gods, was changed to an abomination and Nabonidus tormented the inhabitants with unbelievable oppression and forced labor. The sanctuaries of all their settlements were in ruins and the inhabitants of Sumer and Akkad had become like the living dead. Marduk, the king of the gods, scanned and searched for a righteous ruler, finally coming upon Cyrus's good deeds and his upright mind and ordered him to march against the City of Babylon. The angry inhabitants of Akkad had revolted but were massacred by Nabonidus, who, upon his return to Babylon, was arrested, but nevertheless was treated with respect. When Nabonidus died in the year following, Cyrus participated in the national mourning time that was proclaimed for him. The gods of Akkad were then returned to their sacred cities. All the inhabitants of Sumer and Akkad, including princes and governors, greeted Cyrus as a master who brought them back from a living death. All who had been spared damage and disaster revered his very name.

     

    Cyrus's Declaration:

    "I am Cyrus, the king of the world, great king, legitimate king (son of Cambyses) whose rule Bel and Nebo loved and whom they wanted as king to please their hearts.

    "When I entered Babylon as a friend and established the seat of government in the place of the ruler under jubilation and rejoicing, Marduk, the great lord (induced) the magnanimous inhabitants of Babylon (Din Tir) (to love me) and I daily endeavored to praise him. My numerous troops walked around in Babylon in peace, I did not allow anybody to terrorize (any of the people) of the country of Sumer and Akkad. I strove for peace in Babylon (Ka Dingir ra) and in all his (other) sacred cities. As to the inhabitants of Babylon (who) against the will of the gods (had/were I abolished) the corvee (yoke) which was against their (social standing). I brought relief to their dilapidated housing, putting an end to their main complaints. Marduk, the great lord, was well pleased with my deeds and sent friendly blessing to myself, Cyrus, the King, who reveres him, to Cambyses, my son, as well as to all my troops, and we all (praised) his great (name) joyously, standing before him in peace I returned to (these) sacred cities on the other side of the Tigris, the sanctuaries of which have been ruins for a long time, the images which (used) to live therein and established for them permanent sanctuaries. I (also) gathered all their (former) inhabitants and returned (to them) their habitations. Furthermore, I resettled upon the command of Marduk, the great lord, all the gods of Sumer and Akkad who Nabonidus has brought to Babylon (su sa na) to the anger of the lord of the gods unharmed in their chapels, the places which make them happy.

    May all the gods whom I have resettled in their sacred cities ask Bel and Nebo daily for a long life (six lines destroyed) and always with good words remember my good deeds that Babylonians incessantly cherished me because I resettled them in comfortable habitations I endeavored to strengthen the fortification of Imgur-Enlil and the great fortification of the City of Babylon the side brick wall by the city's trench which the former king (had built and had not finished). This was finished around (the city), that none of the former kings, despite the labor of their yoked people, had not accomplished. I rebuilt and completed with tar and brick and installed large gates entrances were built by cedar wood covered with brass and copper pivot I strengthened all the gates I saw inscribed the name of my predecessor, King Ashurbanipal."

    On this historical turning point, by order of Cyrus, all the captive nationalities held as slaves for generations in Babylon were freed and the return to their homeland was financed. Among the liberated captives were 50,000 Jews held in Babylon for three generations whose return toward the rebuilding of their temple in Palestine, a policy that was followed by Darius and his successors. Some of the liberated Jews were invited to and did settle in Persia. Because of such a generous act, Cyrus has been anointed in the Bible. He is the only gentile in the Bible, who has been titled Messiah, an is mentioned explicitly as the Lord's shepherd and his anointed (Messiah). Other references to Cyrus are attested in Isaiah 45:4 where Cyrus is called by name and given a title of honor; he is also called to rebuild the God's city and free His people (Is. 45:13) and is chosen, called and brought successful by God (Is. 48:14-15).

    What took place after the victory in Babylon was contrary to the standard of the time. Based on the inscriptions of the neighboring countries (Assyrians, Babylonians), it was customary to destroy the vanquished cities, level houses and temples, massacre the people or enslave the population, replace them with snakes, wolves and even carry away the soil to make the land barren. But here, peace and liberty replaced the massacre and slavery, and construction substituted for destruction. After Cyrus, his son Cambyses ruled for eight years (530BC to 522 BC) and captured Egypt, and as a sign of respect toward their culture and religion, he prostrated himself before the goddess, Meith and paid homage to Apis, the Egyptian totem (Bull).

    After Cambyses, Darius took over the throne and ruled form 522BC to 486BC. From 518BC to 515BC he established peace and tranquility in Egypt and also paid homage to their totem, Apis. Darius, in his inscriptions, expresses faith in the commands of Ahuramazda. He declares "Whoever worships Ahuramazda, shall receive happiness in life and after death." He calls Elamites faithless, and because they did not worship Ahuramazda, yet he does not pressure them to change faith. Darius exhorts his successors "thou shalt be king thereafter, protect yourself from the lies and punish the liar and deceitful."

    He entreats God's grace for the protection of Persia against rancor, enemy, famine and the lie. At times he alludes to other gods that may either indicate the old Aryan gods who still had strong followings or the gods of other nations under his rule, for the display of reverence toward their religions.

    REFERENCES:

    A. Arfaee, The command of Cyrus the Great (in Persian), quoted the opinion of Sydney Smith.

    Grayson, Assyrian and Babylonian chronicles, p110, dates the fall of Babylon on Oct. 12th and Cyrus's entry on Oct 29th.

    J. B. Pritchard, The ancient Near East, Vol. 1, 1958, p203.

    A fragment in the Yale's Babylon collection was identified in 1970 by P.R.Berger, the professor of Munster, Germany, as part of Cyrus's cylinder that was transferred to the British Museum and added to the cylinder, who wrote in the journal of Assyrology (Zeiserrift fir Assiriologie), July 25, Vol. 64. The remainder of the text is quoted from A.

    Arafaee, which was the missing portion kept in Yale University. Bible, 2 Chronicles 36:15-23
    Bible, Ezra 1:1-11, Ezra 2:12-70
    Bible, Ezra 7:8
    Bible, Ezra 6:3-4-5
    Bible, Ezra 7:15-25
    Bible, Isaiah 44:28 and 45:1

     

    Darius Jahanian, M.D. is an obstetrician-gynecologist in the Kansas City area, with degree from University of Tehran and Washington University, St. Louis. He is a co-founder and president of the Fravahar Zoroastrian Youth organization of Tehran. Darius served as trustee of the Rostam Guiv Trust of California 1981-89, is a trustee and VP of the Rostam Guiv Foundation of New York since 1990, and its president since 1992. He is a founder and two-term president of the Zoroastrian Association of Kansas. A noted author and lecturer on the Zoroastrian religion, Darius also teaches religion classes for children.

     

    Source: Zoroastrianism and Biblical Connections

    http://www.savepasargad.com/aa.from%20091806/destruction/cyrus-jahanian.htm 

     

    Campaign to Free Women's Rights Defenders in Iran: Three Women's Rights Defenders Remain in Detention

     

      Se også  mine blog om emnet:

    http://shahrezad.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!72073E5B4E136E3B!3798.entry

     

     

     

                                                         

     

    Campaign to Free Women's Rights Defenders in Iran: Three Women's Rights Defenders Remain in Detention

    3/8/07

    This year, the International Women's Day is marked by the attack, arrest and detention of women's rights defenders in front of Tehran's Revolutionary Court. On Sunday March 4th, thirty three women were arrested following a peaceful demonstration. As of now thirty of these women have been released. Those released confirm that the remaining women— Shadi Sadr, Mahbubeh Abbasgholizadeh, and Jila Baniyaghoub,— are still in ward 209 of Evin Prison (run by the Ministry of Intelligence of Islamic Republic of Iran, designated primarily for the political prisoners). The reason for their detention is drafting a statement that called for the gathering.

     

    On Sunday March 4, 2007, women's right defenders gathered in front of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran to protest the court proceedings of Nooshin Amhadi Khorasani, Parvin Ardalan, Shahla Entesari and Susan Tahmasebi, Fariba Davoodi Mohajer—five prominent members of Iranian women's organizations who were arrested in pervious peaceful gatherings. As indicated by the women's right activists and their legal teams the charges are in violation of the article 27 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran, which guarantees the citizens' right to assemble peacefully. In violation of such right, the security police forces attacked women's legal and peaceful gathering and arrested thirty-three protestors.

     

    On March 5, fifty family members and friends of detainees gathered in front of the main entrance of Evin prison to protest the illegal arrests of their loved ones and to demand their immediate release. Consequently, prison authorities declared that Evin prison does not have the authority to release the detainees, as they are kept in ward 209, which is monitored and supervised by the Ministry of Intelligence.

     

    In the following days, two groups of women were released from prison. This morning, at around 2:00 am, another group of fifteen women were released. It seems the reason for keeping the three women in detention is that they have accepted full responsibility for drafting the call for the gathering that took place on March 4.

     

    Many international human rights and women organizations and prominent figures including Iranian political and social activists, lawyers, writers, journalists, and academics have denounced the arrest of women's rights advocates demanding their immediate and unconditional release, including Louise Arbor, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Irene Khan, Amnesty International General Secretary, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights First, Women Living Under Muslim Laws, Women's Initiative for Gender Justice and the Observatory. Yet, more women's rights advocates are being summoned to the court and threatened by arrest. This is while the authorities are promising release of more detainees.

    The campaign has been launched immediately after the arrest of women activists by a group of transnational activists. For more information about the campaign and the complete list of supporters, please visit the site:

     

    http://www.meydaan.org/English/campaign.aspx?cid=52

    http://www.meydaan.org/English/petition.aspx?cid=52&pid=11

     

    Contacts For Updated and Detailed Information:

     

    The Free Women's Rights Defenders in Iran Campaign coordinators are ready to provide detailed information about the status of women detainees.

     

    The coordinators are willing to put reporters and news agencies in touch with the families and lawyers of the women in custody. The campaign coordinators can be contacted by phone or email.
     

    Soheila Vahdati, soheilavahdati@gmail.com +1.510.813.7786

     

    Sanam Dolatshahi, sanamdi@gmail.com   +1.352.359.3789

     

     

     

    Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh
    Mahbubeh Abbasgholizadeh is the editor of the Zanan quarterly journal and is a key member of the Campaign Against Stoning. She has also served as the director of the NGO Training Center. In November 2004, Mahboobeh Abbasgholozadeh was arrested as a result of her activism on women's rights and was detained for over a month.

     

    Shadi Sadr
    Shadi Sadr is a prominent lawyer, journalist, and activist. She founded Zanan-e Iran, the first website dedicated to the work of Iranian women's rights activists, and she has written numerous articles and several books on the subject of Iranian women and their legal rights. Shadi Sadr has represented a number of persecuted activists and journalists and has donated her time in successfully overturning the convictions of several women sentenced to execution. 

    jila-baniyaghoob.jpg

    Jila Baniyaghoub
    Jila Baniyaghoub is a well-known journalist. She is the editor of the website of the Iranian Women's Society and the editor of the society and women's sections of Sarmaye newspaper . She is best-known for her book on Iranian women's journalism and for her reports from Iraq and Afghanistan.

     

     http://www.payvand.com/news/07/mar/1113.html

     

      Brief Interview with Parastoo Dokouhakie after Release

    Date: 03/07/2007 23:26:25 

    Meydaan Site- We know Parastoo Dohouhakie as an active journalist in the field of women's issues. A journalist who has one of the most famous weblogs (zannevesht). To summarize her activities we can give the names of a lot of websites and newspapers. Starting from Women's Journal to the latest ones such as Etemad and Etemad-e Milli.
    Parastoo Dokouhakie was one of the detainees who was arrested in front of Islamic Revolutionary Court, and after 54 hours of detention was released at 17:00, Esfand 15. Three hours after that she had a very brief interview with Meydaan Site and described the procedures and events that took place. Her tone was happy and cheerful. During our short telephone conversations she received a lot of phone calls from her friends, whom she answered very briefly, while she was very happy and a lot of guests were attending her house. They would call her a hero, revolutionary but she would answer: no! The revolutionaries are still in there. There would be a hundred questions if there was enough time, but her nonstop report would answer a lot of those questions.
    She had not been there to join the hunger strike. They told her that they want to change her cell. This change was release. Why the prison authorities did put it in this way, she says: "Maybe they didn't want the others to know."
    She didn't know enough about the hunger strike. Decisions or putting colors on the walls took place while she was being interrogated.
    They throw me in the Hice
    Parastoo tells the story from the beginning. Since the beginning we were sitting peacefully in front of Islamic Revolutionary Court: "At the beginning we were calmly sitting there. They would come and say: we will come and get you. They were threatening us. We would say that we are here waiting for our friends. Then a Hice came along a minibus. They forcibly took us to the minibus. It was my turn. I saw that the Hice is full. I had slowed down and I thought I have to go and get into the minibus, almost 20 were on board of the Hice. Suddenly a hand grabbed my in the back and took me to the air. I was writhing up there but it was useless then he through me inside the Hice. My body bruised." First we went to Eshrat Abad, they kept us there for a while. Women police forces were changed and we went to Vozara."
    Inside the Hice instead of Court
    It was in the Hice that I saw Shadi. She was the lawyer of one of the women whose trial was due the day. They saw that they are taking us so left the court and joined us. I saw the others later."
    Shadi Sadr is the lawyer of Shahla Entesarie.
    All in 2 rooms
    Monkerat building in Vozara doesn’t have any sign or tableau anymore. There were loads of people, men and women waiting of police cars that would frequently stop and some women with clotted make ups or black old manteau, which was considered as abnormal by the police, would get out and these were the signs to recognize this white stone building. But this time the building had and unusual and different guest. Women with usual appearances more like employees and students. 33 who were arrested in front of Revolutionary Court were detained in 2 attached rooms. Parastoo says:"To form the files there, they interrogated us. With basically one or two questions that why we are there and why are we arrested?"
    She continues:"We waited there. It was almost 8 when they took us to the cars."
    I ask her if they told them where they are being taken and she says:"they told us no to repeat what we did. They told they want to release us. I had the experience of Azadi Stadium and it was obvious for me that they are lying. Then they took us to Evin."
    Parastoo was right, in the aggregation of Esfand 10, 1384 in front of West door of Azadi Stadium a number of girls were gathered together, wearing white scarves, and wanted to watch the game of Iran National Football Team with Costa Rica. Police forces arrive with an old minibus and promise to take them in from the eastern door. Once they get into the car, the police start threatening them. They cruise around 30 to 40 minutes inside the city and then leave them in the street. Some of the girls returned and hang their tickets from the trees.
    They would violently fold our eyes
    Nearly 33 were taken to Evin prison by car. Parastoo says: "their behavior was despising. They would fold our eyes and we would accept and we would say it is illegal and torture so they would forcibly do it. During the time of reception we would hear the loud voice of Nushin and Parvin and Susan calling I don't know to the judge or the inspector of the file. They were arguing in a loud tone and we could hear shouting. They wanted to threaten us."
    Entesarie at Solitary Confinement
    From the very first moment in Evin Prison or section 209, Shahla Entesarie was separated from us and was taken to solitary confinement. Dokouhakie says:"Since we were released she was there" Shadi Sadr, her lawyer, is also detained.
    Interrogation at midnight: 4 hours
    They divide these 33 people in different rooms. It is past 11:00 pm. Parastoo says:"I was with Zhila Baniyaghoub, Farideh Entesari and Mahboubeh HosseinZadeh. It was less than half an hour that we were there and they called me."
    They take Parastoo in, they fold her eyes and sit her in front of a wall. Parastoo's objection regarding the folds and the illegal act in this regard is answered:"you can take them off." She takes them off.
    First question is regarding her biography and the second one about her political and social activities. Parastoo says:"I said that I didn't have any political activity. I had a terrible headache. I couldn't answer the questions."
    They take her to the clinic, she gets an injection and comes back. The interrogation starts this way:"well lets talk a little bit."
    Parastoo insists that it should be without folds and face to face. They accept. "the interrogation lasted at least 3.5 hours. All the things that I wrote was less than 2 pages. He was mostly talking and trying to guide me. He was reasoning that why our act is wrong and which one is a better practice in his point of view."
    After defining the accusation, it was written and she was asked to defend herself. Parastoo says: "I wrote that I don't accept them. I am a journalist and I was there to collect news. The aggregation, based on article 27, has not been illegal."
    I wrote these on the paper. They told that I need a 50 Million Toman bail. Parastoo says: "I told them that I don't know if my parents can provide such a bail. I have to call and aske them"
    Individual Testimony
    Individual testimony has always been part of the interrogation process. This time they ask Parastoo to write about Shadi Sadr, Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh, Nushin Khorasanie, parvin Ardalan, Shahla Entesarie and Rezvan Moghaddam. But she didn't know them well. She had met some of them for the first time. Parastoo says:"I don't know anything about them. I didn't write it."
    Zan Nevesht was printed
    Around 8:00 in the morning, Parastoo asks to see her interrogator. She tells to the supervisor that she has to add something to what she has said before. She meets him at 10:30. But the second interrogator is someone else. This time they had printed her weblog. Parastoo wanted to follow up the bail. This time they don't even allow her to take off her folds but she sits there in front of the interrogator. This time they also talk about Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh. Parastoo says:"I told that I was supposed to see you. I want to call my family to see if they can pay the bail?"
    She hears the answer:"there is no need. You'll be released without bail."
    But this freedom was granted to hear one day and a half later.
    She was in the cell when they get the telephone number to ask her father to bring his salary slip. They call the same night and the next morning they scheduled the bail. Parastoo was released in the afternoon.
    One hour of pounding for telephone call
    Everything was coordinated in the cell where all of us were together. Some issues were shared by shouting. This morning that they would let us make a phone call, we hit the doors for one hour till they allowed us.
    No Telephone
    Although Shahla Entesarie, Susan Tahmasebi, Shadi Sadr, and Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh were not allowed to make a phone call.
    Hunger Strike
    Parastoo didn't have enough information about hunger strike. At the time when the decision has been shared by shouting, she has been on her interrogation. She says:"Honestly, I didn't catch the hunger strike. I think it started from Nushin's cell and the others were informed. Most of them didn't eat lunch and wanted to quit dinner.
    They would say:"Strike till freedom."
    Our Accusations were defined
    During 24 hours after arrest all of us were informed of our accusation. Parastoo says this and points out:"Till 10:00 pm of the next day in Evin all of us were aware of our accusations." They were trying to act legally. Almost all had the same 50 million Toman bail.
    They will release and not
    Parastoo talks about the release of others:"I think they will release some others. When I was coming out they were talking about three others. But I'm sure they will keep some and they will release them after March 8, 2007." Parastoo's guess is right. Three are at the edge of freedom:"Zeynab Peyghambarzadeh, Nahid Keshavarz and Somayeh Farid."

    http://www.meydaan.org/English/news.aspx?nid=229

    Hjælp Delara Darabi

     
            
                            
     
     
                                     Click here to make your own banner
     
                                  
     
     
     
    Delara Darabi, aged 20, is an Iranian girl at the risk of execution for a murder which took place when she was 17 years old. She denies committing the crime. Iran is a state party to international treaties that expressly prohibit the use of the death penalty for crimes committed by those under the age of 18. According to Delara the murder of her father's female cousin was committed by the 19 year old boyfriend that she was in love with. Delara Darabi initially confessed to the murder, but soon retracted her confession. She claims that Amir Hossein asked her to admit responsibility for the murder to protect him from execution, believing that since she was under the age of 18, she could not be sentenced to death. Delara Darabi was sentenced to death by a lower court in the northern city of Rasht. The sentence has been upheld by the Iran's Suprerior Court. At this stage the Head of the Judiciary has the power to order a stay of execution and a review of the case. Amir Hossein has reportedly received a prison sentence of 10 years for his involvement in the crime. Amnesty International has made several public statements public statements about Delara. Delara is a talented artist and has used paintings to express her feelings. Last year there was en exhibition of her paintings in Tehran. According to the Iranian Etemaad newspaper her death sentence has been confirmed by the Iranian Supreme Court and her execution may be imminent. Her attorney is intending to appeal the verdict. In January 20, 2007 Delara attempted suicide by cutting her wrists, however her cell-mate noticed the incident and called for help. Delara's was rushed to the hospital, where she was revived. Delara physical and emotional health is still unstable.

    As a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Iran has undertaken not to execute anyone for an offence committed when they were under the age of 18.

    Please sign the petition to save Delara's life as we are her last of her hopes:
     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delara_Darabi


    For more information and updates please click on DELARA's BLOG

    http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=56004879&MyToken=ccb87b0f-c7b2-47ac-98e7-91fce833cd18ML

     
    Relevante link:
     
     
     
     
                                             ********************************************************
     
     
     
     

    Nazaninwasfreed from prison

     

     

               Nazanin was freed from prison

     

    Læs om denne sag i mine blog:

    http://shahrezad.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!72073E5B4E136E3B!3147.entry

    http://shahrezad.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!72073E5B4E136E3B!3160.entry

     


                                      

     

                                 

    January 31:

    Nazaninwasfreed from prison today and reunited with her family. She could not believe that this day had arrived. She cried in her mothers arms and took turns embracing her siblings and father.

    Nazanin's lawyer said that she had told him she wanted to go to school and study hard to get her life back (Nazanin only has 2. grade education). Soon afterwards, some of the prisoners Nazanin had served with called and said they already missed her.

    Nazanin said that she was extremely happy, and felt like she had been born again. She thanked and gave her love to everyone who made her release possible.

    February 2:

    These pictures show Nazanin and her family celebrating after she was released from prison on Wednesday.
    (Click on the pictures to see bigger versions):

    February 6:

    Radio interview with Nazanin

    Se:

    http://save.nazanin.googlepages.com/news

    Here are Nazanin's replies to the questions, translated by David Etebari:


    "I was very happy to be free and my freedom is like a new birthday.

    When taken in to custody I did not think that I would end up being imprisoned for almost three years. I was innocent but the judge did not believe me and it wasn't until the re-trial that the witnesses told the truth and judges believed me.

    When I heard the news of my death sentence I was devastated. I wished to die than being executed.

    While in prison I received some news of the activities for my freedom. If it wasn't for all the efforts on my behalf, I would not have been released. I thank Nazanin Afshin-Jam and Mina Ahadi for their efforts as well as everyone who worked so hard to gain my freedom. I also thank everyone who made donations to make the payment of the bail possible. I wish I could do something in return but there is not much that I am capable of doing at this time.

    There are so many innocent inmates in prison but there is nothing that they can do. Many innocent people have been in prison for few years and still unsure of their cases outcome. Shahla Jaahed, Zahra and many others there were sentenced to death.

    I am hopeful that they all be freed with the efforts from outside. They also are hopeful that their innocence be also proven so they too can be free.

    I want me and my sisters to study and finish school.

    Thank you so much."

      http://save.nazanin.googlepages.com/news                                     

    Egypt: Karim Amer sentence makes bloggers new target of the authorities

     
     
     
     
      
     
     
               Egypt: Karim Amer sentence makes bloggers new target of the authorities
     
                                                                                                        
     
     
     
    Læs også :
     
     
                                                                                  
     
                                                             
     
    Amnesty International condemns the four-year sentence handed down by an Egyptian court against blogger Karim Amer, and calls for his immediate and unconditional release.
     

    Press release, 22-02-2007

     

                                            Egyptian blogger sentenced to four years in prisen    

    Amnesty International condemns the four-year sentence handed down by an Egyptian court today against blogger Karim Amer, and calls for his immediate and unconditional release.

    "This sentence is yet another slap in the face of freedom of expression in Egypt," said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Middle East and North Africa Deputy Programme Director. "The Egyptian authorities must protect the peaceful exercise of freedom of expression, even if the views expressed might be perceived by some as offensive. Amnesty International considers Karim Amer to be a prisoner of conscience who is being prosecuted on account of the peaceful expression of his views."

    "The Egyptian authorities must repeal legislation that, in violation of international standards, stipulates prison sentences for acts which constitute nothing more than the peaceful exercise of the rights of freedom of expression, thought, conscience and religion."

    Karim Amer is the first Egyptian blogger to be tried for writing blogs criticizing Egypt's al-Azhar religious authorities, President Husni Mubarak and Islam. Charges against him included "spreading information disruptive of public order and damaging to the country’s reputation", "incitement to hate Islam" and "defaming the President of the Republic".

    http://news.amnesty.org/index/ENGMDE120062007

    Læs også:

    http://web.amnesty.org/pages/egy-200207-news-eng

    http://news.amnesty.org/index/ENGMDE120052007

     

                     AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL


    Embargo Date: 27 October 2006 00:01 GMT


    Amnesty International Statement at the opening of the Internet Governance Forum, Athens 2006

    The Internet is one of the most powerful inventions of the digital age. It has the potential to empower and educate, to cross cultural boundaries and create global communities. It offers the means for any individual with access to a computer and a gateway to the internet to communicate with others across the world in a free flow of information and ideas – a powerful force for human rights.

    But, while the internet has brought freedom of information to millions, for some, it has led to imprisonment by governments that have sought to curtail this freedom. Websites and blogs have been shut down; firewalls built to prevent access to information. Governments have restricted and filtered search engines to keep information from people in their territory.

    Amnesty International has documented the failures of governments to respect and protect the rights to freedom of information, expression, association and privacy, and has highlighted the collaboration of businesses in some of these violations.

    Yahoo! via its Chinese partner company, Alibaba, has provided the authorities with private and confidential information about its users that has been used to convict and imprison journalists. It has also agreed to censor and deny access to information. Microsoft shut down the blog of New York Times researcher Zhao Jing on the basis of a government request. The company has also admitted that it responds to directions from the Chinese government in restricting users of MSN Spaces from using certain terms. Google has launched a censored version of its international search engine in China.

    Recent abuses reported have included imprisoning people for transmitting news and opinions in emails, chat-rooms and on websites, and denying access to information and opinions on the Internet through content removal and filtering of search engines. At particular risk are those who defend the human rights of others.

    Chinese journalist Shi Tao used his Yahoo account to email a US-based website about an internal government directive instructing journalists how to handle media coverage of the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison for "illegally providing state secrets to foreign entities." Yahoo! provided information to the government that was used in his prosecution.

    Tunisian lawyer and human rights defender Mohammed Abbou is serving a three and a half year prison sentence largely for publishing articles critical of the Tunisian authorities on the Internet.

    Vietnamese political dissident Truong Quoc Huy was first arrested in October 2005 with two other young people after chatting on a democracy and human rights website. He was held incommunicado for nine months then released, but, on 18 August 2006, he was rearrested in an Internet cafe in Ho Chi Minh City, where he had logged on to a chatroom. His whereabouts remain unknown and no charges have been publicised.

    Amnesty International considers Shi Tao, Mohammed Abbou, Truong Quoc Huy and many others to be prisoners of conscience. We are deeply concerned about the participation of both governments and businesses in the repression of fundamental human rights through their control of the Internet.

    We bring with us to the Internet Governance Forum the signatures of over 43,000 people who share our concerns and who have signed our pledge for internet freedom:

    I believe the Internet should be a force for political freedom, not repression. People have the right to seek and receive information and to express their peaceful beliefs online without fear or interference. I call on governments to stop the unwarranted restriction of freedom of expression on the Internet - and on companies to stop helping them do it.

    In the United States, Amnesty International has been supporting domestic legislative efforts to protect freedom of expression and privacy on the Internet, including the recently proposed Global Online Freedom Act, but these efforts will be insufficient to address all states and non-U.S. companies.

    All states and all companies must be held to the same standards for upholding and promoting international human rights and humanitarian law, norms and standards.
    Every organ of society is responsible for ensuring that human rights are respected and promoted, including business. Any individual or organization defending human rights peacefully and legitimately should be protected.

    Amnesty International calls on governments:
    - to release immediately and unconditionally all those imprisoned because of the expression online of news and peaceful opinions;

    - to cease harassment and threats against people seeking to express, impart or receive information on the Internet;

    - to neither restrict nor arbitrarily interfere with the operation and usage of the Internet in ways that violate the fundamental rights to information, freedom of expression and privacy. This includes prior censorship, monitoring and surveillance that does not conform with countries’ human rights obligations;

    - to align domestic and local law and regulation with international human rights laws, norms and standards.

    Amnesty International calls on IT and telecommunications companies:
    - to publicly commit to honoring human rights, and develop human rights policies that state a clear commitment to support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and comply with the requirements of the UN Global Compact;

    - to be transparent about any words, phrases or concepts they are filtering or censoring, and the laws under which they are doing this;

    - to exhaust all judicial and administrative remedies when faced with requests that would deny a person’s right to privacy or free expression;

    - to exercise leadership in promoting human rights with governments and to participate with civil society in efforts to promote people’s fundamental rights.

    Amnesty International looks forward to being a part of the process that will protect human rights on the Internet and ensure that all organs of society live up to their responsibility in promoting and upholding these rights. We are eager to participate in and support any process that stems from this conference that aims to ensure that the Internet is a place where human rights of all people are respected and protected.


    Public Document
    ****************************************
    For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
    Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW. web:
    http://www.amnesty.org

    For latest human rights news view http://news.amnesty.org

     http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engpol300542006

    Embargo Date: 27 October 2006 00:01 GMT


    "Call to Bloggers" to stand up for freedom ahead of world meeting on future of Internet
    Urgent appeal for Iranian blogger held incommunicado


    Amnesty International today issued a ‘Call to Bloggers’, asking them to get online and stand up for freedom of expression on the internet. The organisation says this is a critical time when fundamental rights – particularly freedom of expression and privacy – are under threat from governments that want to control what their citizens say, and what information they can access.

    The call comes as the online world prepares to meet at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF, Athens 30/10 – 2/11) to discuss the future of the internet. Amnesty released a statement to the IGF today and is sending a delegation to ensure that human rights are not sidelined and remain at the heart of the forum’s discussions.

    Amnesty’s International's statement also coincides with an urgent appeal on behalf of a blogger in Iran who was detained this month. Kianoosh Sanjari was arrested earlier this month while reporting on clashes between security forces and supporters of Shi'a cleric Ayatollah Boroujerdi. He is being held incommunicado and Amnesty International fears that he may be at risk of torture or ill-treatment. Sanjari had allegedly gone to the home of Ayatollah Boroujerdi in the capital, Tehran, to prepare a report on the clashes that were taking place there.

    Steve Ballinger, part of Amnesty International’s delegation to the IGF, said:

    “Freedom of expression online is a right, not a privilege – but it’s a right that needs defending. We’re asking bloggers worldwide to show their solidarity with web users in countries where they can face jail just for criticising the government.

    “The Internet Governance Forum needs to know that the online community is bothered about free expression online and willing to stand up for it.”

    Amnesty International is calling on governments and companies to ensure that human rights – particularly the rights to freedom of expression, association and the right to privacy – are respected and protected.

    Steve Ballinger added:

    “The internet is a powerful force for human rights, enabling the free flow of ideas and information around the world.

    “But some governments have sought to curtail this freedom. People have been locked up just for expressing their views in an email or a website. Sites and blogs have been shut down and firewalls built to prevent access to information. Companies have restricted internet searches to stop people accessing information that repressive governments don’t want them to see.

    “Countries and businesses have failed to respect, protect and promote the rights to freedom of expression, association and privacy, and the rights of human rights defenders.”

    Yahoo! via its Chinese partner company, Alibaba, has provided the Chinese authorities with private and confidential information about its users that has been used to convict and imprison journalists. It has also agreed to censor and deny access to information. Microsoft shut down the blog of New York Times researcher Zhao Jing on the basis of a Chinese government request. The company has also admitted that it responds to directions from the Chinese government in restricting users of MSN Spaces from using certain terms. Google has launched a censored version of its international search engine in China.

    Amnesty International is also highlighting the cases of prisoners of conscience, imprisoned for the expression of their peaceful views online.

    Chinese journalist Shi Tao used his Yahoo! account to email a US-based website about an internal government directive instructing journalists how to handle media coverage of the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison for "illegally providing state secrets to foreign entities." Yahoo! provided information to the government that was used in his prosecution.

    Tunisian lawyer and human rights defender Mohammed Abbou is serving a three and a half year prison sentence largely for publishing articles critical of the Tunisian authorities on the internet.

    Vietnamese political dissident Truong Quoc Huy was first arrested in October 2005 with two other young people after chatting on a democracy and human rights website. He was held incommunicado for nine months then released, but on 18 August 2006 he was rearrested in an internet cafe in Ho Chi Minh City, where he had logged on to a chatroom. His whereabouts remain unknown and no charges have been publicised.

    Steve Ballinger said:

    “We bring with us to the Internet Governance Forum the voices of thousands of people who share our concerns and who have supported Amnesty’s irrepressible.info campaign.

    “We are calling on governments to release prisoners who are held just for expressing their peaceful views online, and to stop unwarranted censorship of internet sites and searches.”

    The organisation welcomed the opportunity presented by the IGF to raise concerns with human rights and the internet.

    Steve Ballinger added:

    “We are looking forward to participating in the IGF, and being part of a process that will protect human rights on the internet. Amnesty’s job in Athens will be to ensure that human rights are not sidelined – they must be at the heart of all the forum’s discussions.”

    Note to Editors
    For more media information, including advanced copies of Amnesty International’s statement to the IGF, its appeal to bloggers and its Urgent Action appeal for Iranian blogger Kianoosh Sanjari, please contact:
    Steve Ballinger, Amnesty International press office, +44 (0)20 7033 1548 or +44 (0)7891 565592

    For a copy of AI's Urgent Action for Kianoosh Sanjari, please see:
    http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE131212006
    From 27 October, Amnesty International’s statement to the IGF will be available at this link: http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engpol300542006

    For more information on Amnesty’s campaign for internet freedom see: http://irrepressible.info


    Public Document
    ****************************************
    For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
    Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW. web:
    http://www.amnesty.org

    For latest human rights news view http://news.amnesty.org

    http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engpol300542006